From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqJf5-0005Yf-2X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:49:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqJf2-0003q7-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:49:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]:46183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqJf1-0003pJ-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:49:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id i189so5289354wmf.1 for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:49:31 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170817230114.3655-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20170817230114.3655-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:49:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87zia5gv12.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] TCG vectorization and example conversion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Richard Henderson writes: > When Alex and I started talking about this topic, this is the direction > I was thinking. The primary difference from Alex's version is that the > interface on the target/cpu/ side uses offsets and not a faux temp. The > secondary difference is that, for smaller vector sizes at least, I will > expand to inline host vector operations. The use of explicit offsets > aids that. OK I think this is a lot more complete than my pass. I'm done with my review for now, I look forward to the next version. It looks like most of the pre-requisites are merged now? -- Alex Bennée