From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpQCO-0007lx-MJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpQCL-0002xJ-PB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:52 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:33441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpQCL-0002x3-8b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:49 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:48 -0400 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: References: <1371674435-14973-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1371674435-14973-9-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:45:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87zjulg4fv.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/12] spapr-rtas: use hypercall interface and remove special vty interfaces List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paul Mackerras , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas Faerber Alexander Graf writes: > On 19.06.2013, at 22:40, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori >> --- >> hw/char/spapr_vty.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- >> include/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.h | 2 -- >> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/char/spapr_vty.c b/hw/char/spapr_vty.c >> index ecc2bb5..4bac79e 100644 >> --- a/hw/char/spapr_vty.c >> +++ b/hw/char/spapr_vty.c >> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int vty_getchars(VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev, uint8_t *buf, int max) >> return n; >> } >> >> -void vty_putchars(VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev, uint8_t *buf, int len) >> +static void vty_putchars(VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev, uint8_t *buf, int len) >> { >> VIOsPAPRVTYDevice *dev = VIO_SPAPR_VTY_DEVICE(sdev); >> >> @@ -86,6 +86,23 @@ static int spapr_vty_init(VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static VIOsPAPRDevice *vty_lookup(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, target_ulong reg) >> +{ >> + VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev; >> + >> + sdev = spapr_vio_find_by_reg(spapr->vio_bus, reg); >> + if (!sdev && reg == 0) { >> + /* Hack for kernel early debug, which always specifies reg==0. >> + * We search all VIO devices, and grab the vty with the lowest >> + * reg. This attempts to mimic existing PowerVM behaviour >> + * (early debug does work there, despite having no vty with >> + * reg==0. */ >> + return spapr_vty_get_default(spapr->vio_bus); >> + } >> + >> + return sdev; >> +} >> + >> /* Forward declaration */ >> static target_ulong h_put_term_char(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPREnvironment *spapr, >> target_ulong opcode, target_ulong *args) >> @@ -211,23 +228,6 @@ VIOsPAPRDevice *spapr_vty_get_default(VIOsPAPRBus *bus) >> return selected; >> } >> >> -VIOsPAPRDevice *vty_lookup(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, target_ulong reg) >> -{ >> - VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev; >> - >> - sdev = spapr_vio_find_by_reg(spapr->vio_bus, reg); >> - if (!sdev && reg == 0) { >> - /* Hack for kernel early debug, which always specifies reg==0. >> - * We search all VIO devices, and grab the vty with the lowest >> - * reg. This attempts to mimic existing PowerVM behaviour >> - * (early debug does work there, despite having no vty with >> - * reg==0. */ >> - return spapr_vty_get_default(spapr->vio_bus); >> - } >> - >> - return sdev; >> -} >> - >> static void spapr_vty_register_types(void) >> { >> spapr_register_hypercall(H_PUT_TERM_CHAR, h_put_term_char); >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c >> index 5887e04..019aed5 100644 >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c >> @@ -44,14 +44,16 @@ static void rtas_display_character(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPREnvironment *spapr, >> uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets) >> { >> uint8_t c = rtas_ld(args, 0); >> - VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev = vty_lookup(spapr, 0); >> - >> - if (!sdev) { >> - rtas_st(rets, 0, -1); >> - } else { >> - vty_putchars(sdev, &c, sizeof(c)); >> - rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); >> - } >> + target_ulong hargs[4] = { > > This is too small. I believe it works with today's code, but the > hypercall ABI allows for more registers to be accessed, Not for this hypercall, but I can introduce spapr_hypercall[0-9] calls if it makes you feel better about it :-) > so we should at least pad the array to not run into potential buffer overflows: > > The general purpose registers r0 and r3-r12, the CTR and XER registers are volatile along with the condition register fields 0 and 1 plus 5-7. > >> + 0, /* reg=0 */ >> + 1, /* len=1 */ >> + (uint64_t)c << 56, /* data */ > > Ugh. So the interface really is that broken? Oh well .... It is. There must have been some mighty powerful crack that the lads that designed this interface had been smoking... Regards, Anthony Liguori > > > Alex > >> + 0 /* data */ >> + }; >> + target_ulong ret; >> + >> + ret = spapr_hypercall(cpu, H_PUT_TERM_CHAR, hargs); >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, ret); >> } >> >> static void rtas_get_time_of_day(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPREnvironment *spapr, >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.h >> index f98ec0a..817f5ff 100644 >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.h >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.h >> @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static inline int spapr_vio_dma_set(VIOsPAPRDevice *dev, uint64_t taddr, >> >> int spapr_vio_send_crq(VIOsPAPRDevice *dev, uint8_t *crq); >> >> -VIOsPAPRDevice *vty_lookup(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, target_ulong reg); >> -void vty_putchars(VIOsPAPRDevice *sdev, uint8_t *buf, int len); >> void spapr_vty_create(VIOsPAPRBus *bus, CharDriverState *chardev); >> void spapr_vlan_create(VIOsPAPRBus *bus, NICInfo *nd); >> void spapr_vscsi_create(VIOsPAPRBus *bus); >> -- >> 1.8.0 >>