From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCRta-0006ic-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:09:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCRtQ-00087c-NY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:09:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCRtQ-00087X-FT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:08:56 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1347562697-15411-3-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> (Orit Wasserman's message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:58:16 +0300") References: <1347562697-15411-1-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> <1347562697-15411-3-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87zk4trmzx.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] Separate inet_connect into inet_connect (blocking) and inet_nonblocking_connect Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Orit Wasserman Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, akong@redhat.com Orit Wasserman wrote: > No need to add non blocking parameters to the blocking inet_connect > add block parameter for inet_connect_opts instead of using QemuOpt "block". > > Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela