From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
Don Slutz <Don@cloudswitch.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: Add support for new LSI Logic devices.
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:14:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zk4ujc8f.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50517C05.3080708@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 12/09/2012 15:58, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Why would someone use this verses megasas vs. LSI vs virtio-scsi?
>
> LSI is dead. Compare it to IDE.
>
> virtio-scsi has the highest performance, but it is not supported on all
> guests. Compare it to virtio-blk.
>
> This vs. megasas is a good question; both can be compared to AHCI, they
> have good performance and have the advantage of compatibility with real
> hardware. If this had gone in first, I would probably have rejected
> megasas, but this has the advantage of being used in VMware and
> VirtualBox. Plus, unlike megasas Don said he'd work on SeaBIOS support,
> so it has further merit.
Okay. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-11 17:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: Add support for new LSI Logic devices Don Slutz
2012-09-11 23:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-12 6:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-12 12:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-12 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-13 6:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-13 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-10-04 13:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-09-13 12:43 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-12 6:58 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2012-09-13 17:10 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-12 15:38 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-13 12:46 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-13 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-13 20:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-29 14:35 ` Don Slutz
2012-10-01 14:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-08 19:03 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zk4ujc8f.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=Don@cloudswitch.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).