qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Fix a possible crash when halting a guest during migration
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:42:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <892d9b4f-a15f-4655-b6e1-ffabba9d48ae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jyyrv1br.fsf@suse.de>

On 12/12/2025 22.26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> On 08/12/2025 16.26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> When shutting down a guest that is currently in progress of being
>>>>> migrated, there is a chance that QEMU might crash during bdrv_delete().
>>>>> The backtrace looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Thread 74 "mig/src/main" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>>>
>>>>>    [Switching to Thread 0x3f7de7fc8c0 (LWP 2161436)]
>>>>>    0x000002aa00664012 in bdrv_delete (bs=0x2aa00f875c0) at ../../devel/qemu/block.c:5560
>>>>>    5560	        QTAILQ_REMOVE(&graph_bdrv_states, bs, node_list);
>>>>>    (gdb) bt
>>>>>    #0  0x000002aa00664012 in bdrv_delete (bs=0x2aa00f875c0) at ../../devel/qemu/block.c:5560
>>>>>    #1  bdrv_unref (bs=0x2aa00f875c0) at ../../devel/qemu/block.c:7170
>>>>>    Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x3f7de7f83e0
>>>>>
>>>
>>> How does the migration thread reaches here? Is this from
>>> migration_block_inactivate()?
>>
>> Unfortunately, gdb was not very helpful here (claiming that it cannot access
>> the memory and stack anymore), so I had to do some printf debugging. This is
>> what seems to happen:
>>
>> Main thread: qemu_cleanup() calls  migration_shutdown() -->
>> migration_cancel() which signals the migration thread to cancel the migration.
>>
>> Migration thread: migration_thread() got kicked out the loop and calls
>> migration_iteration_finish(), which tries to get the BQL via bql_lock() but
>> that is currently held by another thread, so the migration thread is blocked
>> here.
>>
>> Main thread: qemu_cleanup() advances to bdrv_close_all() that uses
>> blockdev_close_all_bdrv_states() to unref all BDS. The BDS with the name
>> 'libvirt-1-storage' gets deleted via bdrv_delete() that way.
>>
> 
> Has qmp_blockdev_del() ever been called to remove the BDS from the
> monitor_bdrv_states list? Otherwise your debugging seems to indicate
> blockdev_close_all_bdrv_states() is dropping the last reference to bs,
> but it's still accessible from bdrv_next() via
> bdrv_next_monitor_owned().

As far as I can see, qmp_blockdev_del() is never called, so yes, looks like 
blockdev_close_all_bdrv_states() drops the last reference here while its 
still available from bdrv_next() ...

The weird thing is also that I can only reproduce the issue on s390x so far, 
not on x86 ... I wonder whether we're missing something there...

  Thomas



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-08 13:51 [PATCH] migration: Fix a possible crash when halting a guest during migration Thomas Huth
2025-12-08 14:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-12-08 15:26   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-12-12 17:18     ` Thomas Huth
2025-12-12 21:26       ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-12-15 13:42         ` Kevin Wolf
2025-12-15 15:11           ` Thomas Huth
2025-12-15 15:28             ` Kevin Wolf
2025-12-15 16:12               ` Peter Xu
2025-12-16  7:18                 ` Thomas Huth
2025-12-15 13:42         ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-12-08 15:45 ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=892d9b4f-a15f-4655-b6e1-ffabba9d48ae@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).