From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, sferdjao@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui <sahid.ferdjaoui@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qemu: add capability for vhost-net busy polling
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:23:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8965c06b-0859-0819-1fc4-d09dd287fec8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170618031516.GN22043@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]
On 06/17/2017 09:15 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> (CCing qemu-devel and the QAPI maintainers. I have a question
> about introspection below.)
>
>
> Fortunately, netdev options are modelled in the QAPI schema as
> union Netdev. However, 'query-qmp-schema' doesn't seem to
> include union Netdev because it is not referenced by any QMP
> command or event.
I've posted patches in the past (qemu 2.6 timeframe, if I recall) that
changed netdev_add into a fully-advertised interface, but we didn't take
it then because we weren't sure how to handle the fact that netdev_add
can currently accept both an integer (1) and a string ("1") as
identical, and we didn't want to risk breaking clients that passed a
string when the promoted command would only accept integers. I guess we
should revive that.
>
> Markus, Eric, Michael: is there any way libvirt can query the
> definition of union Netdev from the schema with current QEMU?
Really, we need to promote netdev_add to a full-fledged QMP command.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-26 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170615141715.17708-1-sferdjao@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20170615141715.17708-2-sferdjao@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <2bb5a8a3-37c9-3dd2-4483-c8a2fed5bb4d@redhat.com>
2017-06-18 3:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qemu: add capability for vhost-net busy polling Eduardo Habkost
2017-06-26 13:23 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-06-27 2:24 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-06-27 2:41 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8965c06b-0859-0819-1fc4-d09dd287fec8@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=laine@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sahid.ferdjaoui@redhat.com \
--cc=sferdjao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).