From: Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner <maxbr@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Filip Hejsek" <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Cc: amit@kernel.org, armbru@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
eduardo@habkost.net, lvivier@redhat.com,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
mst@redhat.com, noh4hss@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
philmd@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wangyanan55@huawei.com,
zhao1.liu@intel.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] char-pty: add support for the terminal size
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8979fb7f27b9dbe48f6419d515c4d33a77cefe0a.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMvETd_dlUed-nlN@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 09:35 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 08:29:39PM +0200, Filip Hejsek wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-09-17 at 18:53 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 07:11:03PM +0200, Filip Hejsek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2025-09-17 at 17:17 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We shouldn't send any size info to the guest if the hsot
> > > > > backend
> > > > > does not have it available.
> > > >
> > > > Does that mean sending 0x0, or not sending anything at all? The
> > > > later
> > > > is tricky, because for non-multiport devices it's only really
> > > > possible
> > > > by not offering the feature bit, but we don't know upfront
> > > > whether the
> > > > size command will be used.
>
> What are the semantics in the guest if we sent 0x0 as the size ?
> AFAICT the virtio spec is silent on what '0x0' means.
>
> It seems like it could conceivably have any behaviour, whether
> a zero-size console, or a console clamped to 1x1 as a min size,
> or a console reset to an arbitrary guest default like 80x24.
During testing the kernel resized the tty to 0x0 if VirtIO instructed
the kernel to resize the tty to 0x0.
>
>
> > > Nothing at all - is in no difference from current QEMU behaviour.
> >
> > As I said, that's not possible with the current semantics of the
> > resize
> > command, as we would need to know upfront whether it is going to be
> > used.
> >
> > To get the exact same behavior as current QEMU, we would need to
> > add
> > some way to inform QEMU whether we want to use the resize command
> > (e.g.
> > device property).
>
> That is usually unknowable at the time we spawn QEMU.
>
> I'd say that the common case is for guests to get given a console
> connected to a UNIX socket. Most of the time the console will not
> be used. If it is, then we've no idea whether the client will be
> something virtualization-unaware like a plain 'socat', or something
> virtualization-aware like libvirt's 'virsh console'.
>
> > Even then, depending on how you interpret the virtio spec, there
> > would
> > be a problem with multiport devices if port 0 didn't support size,
> > but
> > another port did. Not providing port 0 size can only be done by not
> > offering the size feature bit, and then the question is, can you
> > still
> > send resize events for the other ports? The spec does not say
> > either
> > way.
> >
> > Note that getting the exact same behavior as current QEMU is still
> > possible by disabling the console-size property on the virtio-
> > serial
> > device (but it applies to all ports).
>
> Yes, it seems like the spec ties our hands here wrt multiple ports.
>
> I didn't apprepreciate in my previous review that integrating this
> support
> into QEMU was going to imply us /always/ informing the guest about
> the
> requested console size for all ports, regardless of the backend.
>
> I had been under the belief that we were only going to pass size info
> to
> the guest, if the chardev was 'stdio', and for all other chardev
> backends
> no size info would be passed unless we had issued the QMP resize
> command.
>
> That we will always pass size info the guest regardless of the
> backend,
> across all ports, changes my view about whether it is reasonable to
> enable resize by default given the known Linux guest bug.
>
> The impact of the guest bug is just about tolerable if we were only
> going
> to enable passing size information when the user had chosen 'stdio'
> backend
> as that is relatively rarely used and mostly by ad-hoc dev usage
> where it
> is perhaps easier for users to get a fixed guest kernel.
>
> If we enable this for all ports though, regardless of backend, then I
> think
> we're going to cause too much pain for users with the inverted
> rows/cols,
> as its going to apply in every single deployment of QEMU using
> virtioconsole.
>
> So IMHO we cannot enable this without explict user opt-in.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-12 3:39 [PATCH v4 00/10] virtio-console: notify about the terminal size Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] chardev: add cols, rows fields Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] chardev: add CHR_EVENT_RESIZE Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] chardev: add qemu_chr_resize() Filip Hejsek
2025-09-18 8:45 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-18 9:31 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] char-mux: add support for the terminal size Filip Hejsek
2025-09-18 8:32 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-18 9:11 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] main-loop: change the handling of SIGWINCH Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] char-stdio: add support for the terminal size Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] qmp: add chardev-resize command Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 14:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-12 18:10 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-15 6:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-15 22:22 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-16 13:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-16 17:01 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-17 8:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] virtio-serial-bus: add terminal resize messages Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 13:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-12 15:02 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-18 8:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-18 8:51 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] virtio-console: notify the guest about terminal resizes Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] char-win-stdio: add support for terminal size Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 8:41 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] virtio-console: notify about the " Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-12 8:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-12 8:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-12 8:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-15 8:41 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-15 8:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-15 16:25 ` [PATCH] char-pty: add support for " Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-15 16:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-15 16:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-15 22:02 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-17 9:39 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-17 13:09 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-17 13:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-17 14:08 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-17 16:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-17 17:11 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-17 17:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-17 18:29 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-18 8:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-18 8:39 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner [this message]
2025-09-18 8:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-18 8:54 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-18 8:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-18 9:05 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-18 19:21 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-18 7:53 ` Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner
2025-09-18 8:10 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-12 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] virtio-console: notify about " Filip Hejsek
2025-09-15 23:02 ` Filip Hejsek
2025-09-15 23:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-17 18:32 ` Filip Hejsek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8979fb7f27b9dbe48f6419d515c4d33a77cefe0a.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=maxbr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=filip.hejsek@gmail.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=noh4hss@gmail.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).