From: Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Sahil Siddiq <sahilcdq@proton.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/3] vhost: Allocate memory for packed vring
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:40:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89ae0aad-eb82-4f51-9384-689a19e1626d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFcRUGb-Nh0E0tKJkKiw7X2E+wOcA6yavRBe7Ly9WKeTK46ENA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 10/28/24 11:07 AM, Sahil Siddiq wrote:
> [...]
> The payload that VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE accepts depends on whether
> split virtqueues or packed virtqueues are used [6]. In hw/virtio/vhost-
> vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_setup() [7], the following payload is used which is
> not suitable for packed virtqueues:
>
> struct vhost_vring_state s = {
> .index = vq_index,
> };
>
> Based on the implementation in the linux kernel, the payload needs to
> be as shown below for the ioctl to succeed for packed virtqueues:
>
> struct vhost_vring_state s = {
> .index = vq_index,
> .num = 0x80008000,
> };
>
> After making these changes, it looks like QEMU is able to set up the
> virtqueues and shadow virtqueues are enabled as well.
>
> Unfortunately, before the L2 VM can finish booting the kernel crashes.
> The reason is that even though packed virtqueues are to be used, the
> kernel tries to run
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() [8]
> (instead of virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed) and throws an "invalid vring
> head" error. I am still investigating this issue.
I made a mistake here. "virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed" [1] in the linux
kernel also throws the same error. I think the issue might be because
hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings [2] does not handle
mapping packed virtqueues at the moment.
Probably because of this, vq->packed.desc_state[id].data [1] is NULL in the
kernel.
Regarding one of the earlier reviews in the same thread [3]:
On 8/7/24 9:52 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:22 PM Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Allocate memory for the packed vq format and support
>> packed vq in the SVQ "start" and "stop" operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sahil Siddiq <sahilcdq@proton.me>
>> ---
>> [...]
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
>> index 4c308ee53d..f4285db2b4 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
>> [...]
>> @@ -672,6 +674,16 @@ size_t vhost_svq_device_area_size(const VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
>> return ROUND_UP(used_size, qemu_real_host_page_size());
>> }
>>
>> +size_t vhost_svq_memory_packed(const VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
>> +{
>> + size_t desc_size = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * svq->num_free;
>> + size_t driver_event_suppression = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event);
>> + size_t device_event_suppression = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event);
>> +
>> + return ROUND_UP(desc_size + driver_event_suppression + device_event_suppression,
>> + qemu_real_host_page_size());
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * Set a new file descriptor for the guest to kick the SVQ and notify for avail
>> *
>> @@ -726,17 +738,30 @@ void vhost_svq_start(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, VirtIODevice *vdev,
>>
>> svq->vring.num = virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, virtio_get_queue_index(vq));
>> svq->num_free = svq->vring.num;
>> - svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
>> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
>> - -1, 0);
>> - desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
>> - svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
>> - svq->vring.used = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_device_area_size(svq),
>> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
>> - -1, 0);
>> - svq->desc_state = g_new0(SVQDescState, svq->vring.num);
>> - svq->desc_next = g_new0(uint16_t, svq->vring.num);
>> - for (unsigned i = 0; i < svq->vring.num - 1; i++) {
>> + svq->is_packed = virtio_vdev_has_feature(svq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED);
>> +
>> + if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(svq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
>> + svq->vring_packed.vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_memory_packed(svq),
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
>> + -1, 0);
>> + desc_size = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * svq->vring.num;
>> + svq->vring_packed.vring.driver = (void *)((char *)svq->vring_packed.vring.desc + desc_size);
>> + svq->vring_packed.vring.device = (void *)((char *)svq->vring_packed.vring.driver +
>> + sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event));
>
> This is a great start but it will be problematic when you start
> mapping the areas to the vdpa device. The driver area should be read
> only for the device, but it is placed in the same page as a RW one.
>
> More on this later.
>
>> + } else {
>> + svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
>> + -1, 0);
>> + desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
>> + svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
>> + svq->vring.used = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_device_area_size(svq),
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
>> + -1, 0);
>> + }
>
> I think it will be beneficial to avoid "if (packed)" conditionals on
> the exposed functions that give information about the memory maps.
> These need to be replicated at
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings.
Based on what I have understood, I'll need to have an if(packed)
condition in vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings() because the mappings will
differ in the packed and split cases.
> However, the current one depends on the driver area to live in the
> same page as the descriptor area, so it is not suitable for this.
Right, for the split case, svq->vring.desc and svq->vring.avail are
mapped to the same page.
svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0);
desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
vhost_svq_driver_area_size() encompasses the descriptor area and avail ring.
> So what about this action plan:
> 1) Make the avail ring (or driver area) independent of the descriptor ring.
> 2) Return the mapping permissions of the descriptor area (not needed
> here, but needed for hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings
Does point 1 refer to mapping the descriptor and avail rings to separate
pages for both split and packed cases. I am not sure if my understanding
is correct.
I believe, however, that this approach will make it easier to map the
rings in the vdpa device. It might also help in removing the if(packed)
condition in vhost_svq_start().
Thanks,
Sahil
[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c#L1708
[2] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c#L1178
[3] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-08/msg01145.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 11:21 [RFC v3 0/3] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 1/3] vhost: Introduce packed vq and add buffer elements Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:40 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 2/3] vhost: Data structure changes to support packed vqs Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 3/3] vhost: Allocate memory for packed vring Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:22 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-11 15:37 ` Sahil
2024-08-11 17:20 ` Sahil
2024-08-12 6:31 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-12 19:32 ` Sahil
2024-08-13 6:53 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-21 12:19 ` Sahil
2024-08-27 15:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-30 10:20 ` Sahil
2024-08-30 10:48 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-08 19:46 ` Sahil
2024-09-09 12:34 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-11 19:36 ` Sahil
2024-09-12 9:54 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-16 4:34 ` Sahil
2024-09-24 5:31 ` Sahil
2024-09-24 10:46 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-30 5:34 ` Sahil
2024-10-28 5:37 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-10-28 8:10 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-10-31 5:10 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-11-13 5:10 ` Sahil Siddiq [this message]
2024-11-13 11:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-05 20:38 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:41 ` [RFC v3 0/3] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89ae0aad-eb82-4f51-9384-689a19e1626d@gmail.com \
--to=icegambit91@gmail.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sahilcdq@proton.me \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).