From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0R2-0004Af-S1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:17:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0Qz-00026B-Kg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:17:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0Qz-00025o-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:17:05 -0400 References: <74846968-830E-4239-9DC7-B1252A5AC946@gmail.com> <60e13112-931d-a517-ddb1-20c2f2de736e@redhat.com> <9CE89958-B59C-4D3C-91C5-ECB4B153C43D@gmail.com> From: Cleber Rosa Message-ID: <89d8b7b1-fb0f-a967-927e-8795c7d2b324@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:16:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9CE89958-B59C-4D3C-91C5-ECB4B153C43D@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KgEfHeG631iDTNK5r8LB9ponTN4wH7LdJ" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Make test List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Programmingkid Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KgEfHeG631iDTNK5r8LB9ponTN4wH7LdJ From: Cleber Rosa To: Programmingkid Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Message-ID: <89d8b7b1-fb0f-a967-927e-8795c7d2b324@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Make test References: <74846968-830E-4239-9DC7-B1252A5AC946@gmail.com> <60e13112-931d-a517-ddb1-20c2f2de736e@redhat.com> <9CE89958-B59C-4D3C-91C5-ECB4B153C43D@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9CE89958-B59C-4D3C-91C5-ECB4B153C43D@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/24/2017 05:50 PM, Programmingkid wrote: >=20 > Thank you for the patches. I will test them. I was wondering what is th= e point to having both 'make check' and 'make test'. It looks like everyo= ne is using 'make check'. Maybe we are better off removing the 'make test= ' target. >=20 I think the removing the `make test` target is a good thing, if its tests are either absorbed by an existing `make check*` one. Now that depends on what people think the tcg tests (and others) deserve... TLC? Total annihilation? --=20 Cleber Rosa [ Sr Software Engineer - Virtualization Team - Red Hat ] [ Avocado Test Framework - avocado-framework.github.io ] [ 7ABB 96EB 8B46 B94D 5E0F E9BB 657E 8D33 A5F2 09F3 ] --KgEfHeG631iDTNK5r8LB9ponTN4wH7LdJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEeruW64tGuU1eD+m7ZX6NM6XyCfMFAlmfUFkACgkQZX6NM6Xy CfPujg/9EVcUOT259vYz8ThW1mg3aMrvHYsk9t6gEUSYvX0Z0NfQU4FURri1SZE6 VFZePm9QcBPz1Km8YZQ0xSvf/y+wuIu/xHwa2cQeoP2W1OHiuCFI5Lw8AQG1tWIo wj6Dr3JEiiwSKPdsOuf6z+oZrM/+zjbQuhEciXbvBHm3u7Uv+ss8cIxms3fsPOWr fzLJTq4RKW+rY7yz3Y4KiPPGBlxIu6DsMcWPJSMp3Iar2eQxIny2h8mh+/m+9kSf EMYom1XnD9Ud93D3A+hkbdlaqhEpKJdPSRpNnm3jYzRFcZkbrP+Vv5I4wxq47wHJ LfTVkTndtmDaJjlUbhbI1NwTcrZv/ZBYBrp9oGneW3YxSvul6kDgpSeR0vC/YIA6 ZPuwFCJmLre/l6z6IaMz9XUfLiZRs/B/oXiaOJji9V845UTm2mNKWXmfWWD0fq10 ZtVICnc+8CsxuslVSss5BzM038Cj7fSDSn8cEl3TVRloA4XLZnnir7/I7mmY9rdP uQw9iquf89YBtkMhu9auCDvjswfqFxZtUp0BILaF2wZQtD9w0saEBG6lC+x2h97t kHrlHkxCUCgqKREVeAItI7U8NCMsDoltt20z/T6pikQLUIKQjLBeMTJAfOXz79R3 RWIkkzAlSzYRsXMEyXFcZYuVggEHcXHuChtL+ZAjwkdjuuR0GP4= =wwRR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KgEfHeG631iDTNK5r8LB9ponTN4wH7LdJ--