From: pierre <pierre@imap.linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:27:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a3ef00a46b8ef8cb935dde69010a942@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74aa9221-debc-84a6-d5bf-0a549018c7c9@redhat.com>
On 2023-02-23 14:30, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 15.20, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On interception of STSI(15.1.x) the System Information Block
>> (SYSIB) is built from the list of pre-ordered topology entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
> ...
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> index d654267a71..c899f4e04b 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> @@ -560,6 +560,25 @@ typedef struct SysIB_322 {
>> } SysIB_322;
>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_322) != 4096);
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG 6
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG6 0
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG5 1
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4 2
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3 3
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2 4
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1 5
>> +/* Configuration topology */
>> +typedef struct SysIB_151x {
>> + uint8_t reserved0[2];
>> + uint16_t length;
>> + uint8_t mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG];
>> + uint8_t reserved1;
>> + uint8_t mnest;
>> + uint32_t reserved2;
>> + char tle[];
>> +} QEMU_PACKED QEMU_ALIGNED(8) SysIB_151x;
>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_151x) != 16);
>
> I think one of the two is enough, either QEMU_PACKED or
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON. Since QEMU_PACKED caused us some troubles in the
> past already, I'd prefer QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON only here.
>
> Also, do we really need the QEMU_ALIGNED() here? ... I don't think so,
> and we also hardly use that anywhere else in the s390x code, so please
> drop that, too (unless there is a real reason for this?).
No, I think we do not really need this.
>
>> @@ -567,9 +586,62 @@ typedef union SysIB {
>> SysIB_221 sysib_221;
>> SysIB_222 sysib_222;
>> SysIB_322 sysib_322;
>> + SysIB_151x sysib_151x;
>> } SysIB;
>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB) != 4096);
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology List provided by STSI with fc=15 provides a list
>> + * of two different Topology List Entries (TLE) types to specify
>> + * the topology hierarchy.
>> + *
>> + * - Container Topology List Entry
>> + * Defines a container to contain other Topology List Entries
>> + * of any type, nested containers or CPU.
>> + * - CPU Topology List Entry
>> + * Specifies the CPUs position, type, entitlement and polarization
>> + * of the CPUs contained in the last Container TLE.
>> + *
>> + * There can be theoretically up to five levels of containers, QEMU
>> + * uses only three levels, the drawer's, book's and socket's level.
>> + *
>> + * A container of with a nesting level (NL) greater than 1 can only
>> + * contain another container of nesting level NL-1.
>> + *
>> + * A container of nesting level 1 (socket), contains as many CPU TLE
>> + * as needed to describe the position and qualities of all CPUs
>> inside
>> + * the container.
>> + * The qualities of a CPU are polarization, entitlement and type.
>> + *
>> + * The CPU TLE defines the position of the CPUs of identical
>> qualities
>> + * using a 64bits mask which first bit has its offset defined by
>> + * the CPU address orgin field of the CPU TLE like in:
>> + * CPU address = origin * 64 + bit position within the mask
>> + *
>> + */
>> +/* Container type Topology List Entry */
>> +typedef struct SysIBTl_container {
>> + uint8_t nl;
>> + uint8_t reserved[6];
>> + uint8_t id;
>> +} QEMU_PACKED QEMU_ALIGNED(8) SysIBTl_container;
>
> dito, please drop QEMU_PACKED and QEMU_ALIGNED() if possible.
OK
>
>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIBTl_container) != 8);
>> +
>> +/* CPU type Topology List Entry */
>> +typedef struct SysIBTl_cpu {
>> + uint8_t nl;
>> + uint8_t reserved0[3];
>> +#define SYSIB_TLE_POLARITY_MASK 0x03
>> +#define SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED 0x04
>> + uint8_t flags;
>> + uint8_t type;
>> + uint16_t origin;
>> + uint64_t mask;
>> +} QEMU_PACKED QEMU_ALIGNED(8) SysIBTl_cpu;
>
> dito
OK
>
> Thomas
Thanks
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 14:20 [PATCH v16 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:20 ` [PATCH v16 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:20 ` [PATCH v16 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-02-23 12:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-23 14:06 ` pierre
2023-02-23 14:13 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-23 14:35 ` pierre
2023-02-22 14:20 ` [PATCH v16 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-02-23 13:30 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-23 14:27 ` pierre [this message]
2023-02-27 13:21 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-08 15:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:20 ` [PATCH v16 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:20 ` [PATCH v16 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 12:39 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 13:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:13 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 08/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-02-24 17:15 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-27 7:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 10:49 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-27 12:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-27 12:51 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-27 15:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-27 10:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 11:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 12:15 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-27 14:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-03-02 15:00 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 8:26 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 8:52 ` [PATCH v17 08/12] " Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 8:52 ` [PATCH v17 12/12] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 09/11] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 13:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:13 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 10/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 13:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:14 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-22 14:21 ` [PATCH v16 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 13:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:17 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 14:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 17:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-03-01 15:52 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-02 8:58 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-27 14:00 ` [PATCH v16 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 14:20 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a3ef00a46b8ef8cb935dde69010a942@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=pierre@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).