From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTENX-0000li-JI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:37:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTENV-0000l8-SB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:37:38 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTENV-0000ku-EN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:37:37 -0400
Received: from [64.233.162.207] (helo=zproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FTESK-0001KG-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:42:36 -0400
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so1077251nzf
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8a6cde920604110137r1e30ebc6o68153171c8e96fba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:37:36 +0100
From: "Ricardo Almeida" <ric.almeida@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed?
In-Reply-To: <443B32A6.20501@foo-projects.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <41e41e7a0604100820y3a20e731n4fb22e14db01e54e@mail.gmail.com>
	<3ef9fbda81a71790b3cc0575ebf95538@localhost>
	<443A8033.9000409@win4lin.com> <443B32A6.20501@foo-projects.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> I do not think that kqemu benefits from being closed source, and probably=
 more
> people with me.

Probably. But people got make for a living and I think that Fabrice
has every right to decide how to make it available. We all must be
thankfull that he give it away for free...

> People will pick an open implementation before any closed one,
> even industry, they're picking up faster than you think ;^)

Take a look at http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/qvm86/ and make it
better if you want...