From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HkdY6-0004Ap-6V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:01:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HkdY4-0004Ad-VA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:01:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkdY4-0004Aa-Re
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:01:00 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ric.almeida@gmail.com>) id 1HkdRD-0001gi-V8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 05:53:56 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so2108129wxd
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 06 May 2007 02:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8a6cde920705060253sfe7ead4h37e7320cc29d72a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 10:53:54 +0100
From: "Ricardo Almeida" <ric.almeida@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vnc2swf + qemu
In-Reply-To: <db7b3ca90705051943t6b3f4f1fm51a5241fe5a3cccb@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <db7b3ca90705051943t6b3f4f1fm51a5241fe5a3cccb@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I'm not a developer, but here's what I think :)

On 5/6/07, Jonathan Kalbfeld <jonathan.kalbfeld@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone thought about this possibility?  I think it could probably be
> adapted to have QEMU automatically spit out a shlockwave flash with audio,
> which would be great.

I don't think so :p

First, I dislike Flash. It's my personal option, but I don't think a
very good format for videos...
Second, it can be made with a GPL external tool that I found in 2
seconds using google
(http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.html), so no need to
bloat QEmu.

Regards,
Ricardo Almeida