From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IHMT0-0000PY-Jf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:27:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IHMSw-0000Nx-Us
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:27:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IHMSw-0000Ns-LZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:26:58 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ric.almeida@gmail.com>) id 1IHMSu-0006mm-VM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:26:57 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g11so3008078rvb
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8a6cde920708040926s6e12edd0mc3b469ab741c5653@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:26:30 +0100
From: "Ricardo Almeida" <ric.almeida@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] merging kqemu into mainline kernel?
In-Reply-To: <f6ca9fed0708030816o769586b9ie67fa1fa86644cdb@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_88989_7278955.1186244790945"
References: <f6ca9fed0708030816o769586b9ie67fa1fa86644cdb@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dragoran <drago01@gmail.com>

------=_Part_88989_7278955.1186244790945
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,
I'm just a user...

Is it planned to submit kqemu to lkml for inclusion into the mainline
> kernel?


Never seen anyone talking about this...

if not why?


Maybe because KVM was included (
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6aa8b732ca01c3d7a54e93f4d701b8aabbe60fb7)


if yes any idea when? is it possible to try to get it in 2.6.24 ?
>

I don't know if Linus would accept it. As I said, KVM was included, although
kqemu as the advantage of working in older hardware (without AMD-V or Intel
equivalent virtualization instructions).
Maybe if it was possible to make merge kqemu into KVM to take the best of
the two... But I don't know anything about KVM nor kqemu code...

Regards,
Ricardo Almeida

------=_Part_88989_7278955.1186244790945
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,<br>I&#39;m just a user...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Is it planned to submit kqemu to lkml for inclusion into the mainline kernel?
</blockquote><div><br>Never seen anyone talking about this... <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">if not why?</blockquote>
<div><br>Maybe because KVM was included (<a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6aa8b732ca01c3d7a54e93f4d701b8aabbe60fb7">http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6aa8b732ca01c3d7a54e93f4d701b8aabbe60fb7
</a>) <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">if yes any idea when? is it possible to try to get it in 2.6.24 ?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>I don&#39;t know if Linus would accept it. As I said, KVM was included, although kqemu as the advantage of working in older hardware (without AMD-V or Intel equivalent virtualization instructions).
<br>Maybe if it was possible to make merge kqemu into KVM to take the best of the two... But I don&#39;t know anything about KVM nor kqemu code...<br><br>Regards,<br>Ricardo Almeida<br>

------=_Part_88989_7278955.1186244790945--