From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1mda-00033k-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:41:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1mdY-00032r-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:41:50 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1mdY-00032o-30 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:41:48 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1mdX-00038d-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:41:48 -0500 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so2475711nzc for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:41:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8a6cde920712100941g4c1a2da9q8dcce681579cfa7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:41:42 +0000 From: "Ricardo Almeida" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Online image backup In-Reply-To: <475D18D3.7060109@develer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4756B1DD.4040009@develer.com> <8a6cde920712051325n193c5166m60e1c3135f1e23a1@mail.gmail.com> <475D18D3.7060109@develer.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > 2.1 Switch to snapshot mode > > How do you switch to snapshot mode *while* the VM is running, i.e. > without stopping and restarting qemu? The only way I know to enter that > mode is using the -snapshot switch at invocation time and I don't think > it can be done online. As I said, I'm just a user ;) I don't see a reason why this can't be implemented... This is the devel list, so if a good idea comes up someone can implement it ;) > If executing step 2.1 is actually possible, you can skip step 3.1 and > 3.2 because the remote copy is already consistent with the state the VM > went throught at the time of execution of step 2.1 . If it was > possible, it would be just fine for automated daily backups. Yes, you're right. I wanted to update a little more but it doesn't really make much sense...