From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Zhenzhong Duan" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: chao.p.peng@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:PowerPC TCG CPUs" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/ppc: Improve build for PPC VFIO
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:19:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a95349c-4005-484f-b623-a1898a224896@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd2db398-908a-46a8-b02b-8418956462cb@redhat.com>
Hi Cédric,
On 23/11/23 08:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 11/23/23 07:01, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> VFIO is not a required subsystem for the pseries machine but it's
>> force enabled currently. When --without-default-devices is used
>> to drop some default devices including vfio-pci, vfio core code
>> is still kept which is unnecessary.
>>
>> Introduce a stub file to hold stub functions of VFIO EEH hooks,
>> then vfio core could be compiled out.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>
>
> Nick,
>
> I will take this patch through the vfio tree if that's OK for you.
>
>> ---
>> Based on vfio-next/vfio-8.2
>>
>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> hw/ppc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> hw/ppc/meson.build | 6 +++---
>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c
We are trying to remove stubs: instead of checking late in the callee,
we shouldn't let the caller call functions depending on an unavailable
feature. So I'm a bit reluctant with this patch.
Can we add a simple 'bool pci_vfio_available(void);' helper? Or rework a
bit. For example looking quickly, we already have:
#ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
#else
static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
{
return false;
}
#endif
This should be enough to protect the other calls.
Maybe we just need:
-- >8 --
--- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
@@ -122,41 +122,20 @@ int spapr_pci_dt_populate(SpaprDrc *drc,
SpaprMachineState *spapr,
void *fdt, int *fdt_start_offset, Error **errp);
/* VFIO EEH hooks */
-#ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
+#if defined(CONFIG_LINUX) && defined(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI)
bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
+#else
+static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+#endif
int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
unsigned int addr, int option);
int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int *state);
int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option);
int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev);
-#else
-static inline bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
-{
- return false;
-}
-static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
- unsigned int addr, int
option)
-{
- return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
-}
-static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
- int *state)
-{
- return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
-}
-static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option)
-{
- return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
-}
-static inline int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
-{
- return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
-}
-static inline void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
-{
-}
-#endif
void spapr_phb_dma_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb);
---
and massage a bit the calls not protected by spapr_phb_eeh_available().
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..adb3fb5e35
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "hw/pci-host/spapr.h"
>> +
>> +bool spapr_phb_eeh_available(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void spapr_phb_vfio_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_set_option(SpaprPhbState *sphb,
>> + unsigned int addr, int option)
>> +{
>> + return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_get_state(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int *state)
>> +{
>> + return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_reset(SpaprPhbState *sphb, int option)
>> +{
>> + return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spapr_phb_vfio_eeh_configure(SpaprPhbState *sphb)
>> +{
>> + return RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/Kconfig b/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>> index edc6d2d139..b8dabdbfbe 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ config PSERIES
>> imply PCI_DEVICES
>> imply TEST_DEVICES
>> imply VIRTIO_VGA
>> + imply VFIO if LINUX # needed by spapr_pci_vfio.c
>
> Zhenzhong,
>
> I changed VFIO to VFIO_PCI because PPC only supports this type
> of passthrough devices.
>
> With that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> C.
>
>
>
>> select NVDIMM
>> select DIMM
>> select PCI
>> select SPAPR_VSCSI
>> - select VFIO_PCI if LINUX # needed by spapr_pci_vfio.c
>> select XICS
>> select XIVE
>> select MSI_NONBROKEN
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/meson.build b/hw/ppc/meson.build
>> index ea44856d43..2df5db2eef 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/meson.build
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/meson.build
>> @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ ppc_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_PSERIES', 'CONFIG_TCG'],
>> if_true: files(
>> 'spapr_softmmu.c',
>> ))
>> ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_SPAPR_RNG', if_true: files('spapr_rng.c'))
>> -ppc_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_PSERIES', 'CONFIG_LINUX'], if_true: files(
>> - 'spapr_pci_vfio.c',
>> -))
>> +ppc_ss.add(when: [ 'CONFIG_VFIO_PCI', 'CONFIG_PSERIES', 'CONFIG_LINUX'],
>> + if_true: files('spapr_pci_vfio.c'),
>> + if_false: files('spapr_pci_vfio_stub.c'))
>> # IBM PowerNV
>> ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_POWERNV', if_true: files(
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 6:01 [PATCH] hw/ppc: Improve build for PPC VFIO Zhenzhong Duan
2023-11-23 7:33 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-11-23 7:48 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-11-23 10:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-11-23 13:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-11-24 7:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-11-24 8:01 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-11-24 6:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a95349c-4005-484f-b623-a1898a224896@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).