From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 13:38:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bb0f2e6-fae8-794b-7954-f9c4add34eee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504105949.GD354891@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1364 bytes --]
On 04/05/20 12:59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Regarding drive_del, I guess the issue here is that this HMP command's
> semantics need to include not synchronize_rcu() but some kind of
> drain_call_rcu() operation as well that ensures deletion has completed?
Good idea, this would be Linux's rcu_barrier().
It would be a pity though that we have to do this instead of just having
the test rely on the DEVICE_DELETED event.
> drain_call_rcu() can be implemented by invoking call_rcu(temp,
> drain_call_rcu_cb, rcu) where drain_call_rcu_cb() sets a QemuEvent that
> the caller is waiting on. This way the caller can be sure that all
> previously queued call_rcu() callbacks have completed. call_rcu_thread()
> needs to be tweaked to avoid g_usleep() and instead use a timed wait so
> that drain_call_rcu() can immediately wake up the thread.
This was actually intentional in order to let some RCU callbacks pile up
(based on the observation, or the hope, that RCU data structures are
written rarely). But the overall delay would be 50 ms so I don't think
it's a big deal to keep the unconditional sleep. The synchronize_rcu()
call could be on the order of 50 ms if --enable-membarrier is in use.
Another thing to care about is that call_rcu needs the iothread lock, so
you need to release it around the qemu_event_wait() call.
Paolo
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 20:36 [PATCH 0/4] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] device-core: use RCU for list of childs of a bus Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 10:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-11 8:48 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-04 11:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-04 11:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 11:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-11 11:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] virtio-scsi: don't touch scsi devices that are not yet realized Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-11 11:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 21:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread no-reply
2020-04-16 21:35 ` no-reply
2020-04-16 21:47 ` no-reply
2020-05-04 10:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-04 11:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-05-04 11:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bb0f2e6-fae8-794b-7954-f9c4add34eee@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).