From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSQeG-0004Xm-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:21:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSQeC-00027R-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:21:27 -0400 References: <1469631104-7972-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <1469631104-7972-2-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <8bc71999-ff55-7b83-a50a-426819633bae@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:21:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1469631104-7972-2-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] ide: fix halted IO segfault at reset List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com On 07/27/16 16:51, John Snow wrote: > If one attempts to perform a system_reset after a failed IO request > that causes the VM to enter a paused state, QEMU will segfault trying > to free up the pending IO requests. > > These requests have already been completed and freed, though, so all > we need to do is NULL them before we enter the paused state. > > Existing AHCI tests verify that halted requests are still resumed > successfully after a STOP event. > > Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek > --- > hw/ide/core.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c > index 081c9eb..d117b7c 100644 > --- a/hw/ide/core.c > +++ b/hw/ide/core.c > @@ -823,6 +823,7 @@ static void ide_dma_cb(void *opaque, int ret) > } > if (ret < 0) { > if (ide_handle_rw_error(s, -ret, ide_dma_cmd_to_retry(s->dma_cmd))) { > + s->bus->dma->aiocb = NULL; > return; > } > } > You forgot your S-o-b from the end of the commit message, and also my R-b from round #1. Looks like my un-orthodox Analyzed-by distracted you too much! ;) Care to resend once more with those two tags added? Thanks! Laszlo