From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADC2C47DDB for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRvtW-0001Rd-UP; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:07:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRvtM-0001PQ-1L; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:07:16 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRvtK-00033i-2f; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:07:15 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40MDB9qp027298; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=yHxhP+TKCeApLrQHrvtfrkxA3HxXu76edoE+20DCaBU=; b=Q4ZmmcEa5cMN+MvL+txYLtS3qtN6JLDuGUYIsht8OKG3MmkuTiEZXb5fzygPsBIywM9h JoviY4opEn8iGauOdm2arZa8fZizkZkMQBe/Gldt3e9NJalLv9k2Te8CujXY5HwcE2Tj 1d3+tK6VBh+5QaCbEfAUsoJG/askHo6yXI2koIQ38B62LC/ckAgoT4Ehuzc/Br28tDdn Vjvf0spTv66T8Swglr6omEqNNeVTMLPk9I1fIyt7wL5pMv9kX58f77ggJOQmARLOBxTk /w5IVSUdASZRKFebh6HmULR4jR0Wv9SA3HHQ0c8TSgn2GS13VzoSzLOtY/2GpK123dZL MA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vsryckhrb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:51 +0000 Received: from m0356517.ppops.net (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 40MEt0PA003671; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:50 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vsryckhpb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:50 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40MF0wn6022429; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:48 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.69]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vrt0krw1v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:48 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.105]) by smtprelay02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 40MF6lAh14025292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:47 GMT Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D554C58055; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0DD58059; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.61.119.211] (unknown [9.61.119.211]) by smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:06:45 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8bd02b29-d90f-4b6a-8cb8-a024be6f8a7c@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:06:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] s390x/pci: fix ISM reset To: Thomas Huth , Michael Tokarev , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, clg@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org References: <20240118185151.265329-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> <85e2c13a-73cf-40df-9708-4012f4dccf55@tls.msk.ru> <3933b2ce-2c96-440d-abc0-c7b12094f2ac@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Matthew Rosato In-Reply-To: <3933b2ce-2c96-440d-abc0-c7b12094f2ac@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: SkBCqn_NpPyEpCik96iJrCuWu4A6508w X-Proofpoint-GUID: zRssz2yqZxQTlk9ojw_88MuDCu1w8_49 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-22_05,2024-01-22_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=851 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401220103 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On 1/22/24 5:49 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 22/01/2024 11.31, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 22.01.2024 13:18, Michael Tokarev : >> .. >>> Is it this a material for -stable, or there's no need to bother? >> >> Actually it's been Cc'd to qemu-stable@ already, I haven't noticed. >> Still there's a question which branches should get which patches. > ... >> So all 3 are okay for 8.2. >> >> What about 8.1 and 7.2 which are the current still-maintained stable branches? >> (I think this 8.1 release will be the last in series). > > IIUC the main issue that this series fixes is the bug that has been uncovered by commit ef1535901a07f2e49fa25c8bcee7f0b73801d824 ("s390x: do a subsystem reset before the unprotect on reboot") - and that one is in 8.2 only. So I think it should be OK to just backport this to 8.2 and skip 8.1 and 7.2. > Agreed. Thanks, Matt