From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Sriram Yagnaraman" <sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-9.2 v15 00/11] hw/pci: SR-IOV related fixes and improvements
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:09:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c035207-f1ee-4e04-be8f-5f1681de10b6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f0e049e-8030-4901-98ea-be17369db59a@daynix.com>
>> Better to fix than to guess if there are users, I think.
>
> Yes, but it will require some knowledge of s390x, which I cannot provide.
>
> Commit 57da367b9ec4 ("s390x/pci: forbid multifunction pci device") says having a multifunction device will make the guest spin forever. That is not what Cédric observed with igb so it may no longer be relevant, but I cannot be sure that the problem is resolved without understanding how multifunction devices are supposed to work with s390x.
>
> Ideally someone with s390x expertise should check relevant hardware documentation and confirm QEMU properly implements mutlifunction devices.
I just cc'ed the s390x PCI maintainers on patch 4. Let's see.
Thanks,
C.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 5:00 [PATCH for-9.2 v15 00/11] hw/pci: SR-IOV related fixes and improvements Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 01/11] hw/pci: Rename has_power to enabled Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 02/11] hw/ppc/spapr_pci: Do not create DT for disabled PCI device Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 03/11] hw/ppc/spapr_pci: Do not reject VFs created after a PF Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 04/11] s390x/pci: Check for multifunction after device realization Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-10 13:22 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-11 9:38 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-11 10:58 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-11 11:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 13:53 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-09-11 15:15 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-11 21:11 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-09-12 6:40 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 05/11] pcie_sriov: Do not manually unrealize Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 06/11] pcie_sriov: Reuse SR-IOV VF device instances Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 07/11] pcie_sriov: Release VFs failed to realize Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 08/11] pcie_sriov: Remove num_vfs from PCIESriovPF Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 09/11] pcie_sriov: Register VFs after migration Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 10/11] hw/pci: Use -1 as the default value for rombar Akihiko Odaki
2024-08-23 5:00 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 11/11] hw/qdev: Remove opts member Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-10 9:21 ` [PATCH for-9.2 v15 00/11] hw/pci: SR-IOV related fixes and improvements Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 9:33 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-10 11:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 13:21 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-10 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 14:13 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-10 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 3:05 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-09-11 10:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 10:09 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c035207-f1ee-4e04-be8f-5f1681de10b6@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).