From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, rth@twiddle.net,
alex.bennee@linaro.org, f4bug@amsat.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-3.0] tests/libqtest: Improve kill_qemu()
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:35:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c082bfd-6753-c8d2-cfcd-e2be77c3f763@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87in553zsx.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 07/24/2018 01:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> In kill_qemu() we have an assert that checks that the QEMU process
>> didn't dump core:
>> assert(!WCOREDUMP(wstatus));
>>
>> Unfortunately the WCOREDUMP macro here means the resulting message
>> is not very easy to comprehend on at least some systems:
>>
>> - if (pid == s->qemu_pid && WIFSIGNALED(wstatus)) {
>> - assert(!WCOREDUMP(wstatus));
>> + } else if (WIFSIGNALED(wstatus)) {
>> + int sig = WTERMSIG(wstatus);
>> + const char *signame = strsignal(sig) ?: "unknown ???";
>> +
>> + if (!WCOREDUMP(wstatus)) {
>> + die = false;
>
> Does WCOREDUMP(wstatus) depend on the user's ulimit -c?
'man waitpid' on Linux mentions that WCOREDUMP is nonportable, but does
not mention any interaction with setrlimit. But a quick test shows:
$ ulimit -S -c 0
$ cat foo.c
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
return *argv[1];
}
$ gcc -o foo -Wall foo.c
$ ./foo 1
$ ./foo
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$
the output was produced by bash, which uses waitpid() - and therefore
the fact that bash reports the core dump even when no core file is
created is promising.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 19:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-3.0] tests/libqtest: Improve kill_qemu() Eric Blake
2018-07-23 20:20 ` Richard Henderson
2018-07-24 6:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-24 14:35 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2018-07-25 16:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-30 21:24 ` Eric Blake
2018-07-31 5:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-24 6:44 ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-30 21:26 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c082bfd-6753-c8d2-cfcd-e2be77c3f763@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).