qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] target/m68k: Use i128 for 128-bit load/store in m68k_copy_line()
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 06:52:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c85fc54-3933-4330-a378-c1b444b0771f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017122702.39311-1-philmd@linaro.org>

On 10/17/23 05:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> Based-on: <20231013175109.124308-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>    tcg: Add tcg_gen_{ld,st}_i128
> 
> RFC because unsure and untested...
> ---
>   target/m68k/translate.c | 14 ++++----------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/m68k/translate.c b/target/m68k/translate.c
> index 4d0110de95..1e3d155bd9 100644
> --- a/target/m68k/translate.c
> +++ b/target/m68k/translate.c
> @@ -4293,23 +4293,17 @@ DISAS_INSN(chk2)
>   
>   static void m68k_copy_line(TCGv dst, TCGv src, int index)
>   {
> +    MemOp mop = MO_128 | MO_TE;
> +    TCGv_i128 t = tcg_temp_new_i128();
>       TCGv addr;
> -    TCGv_i64 t0, t1;
>   
>       addr = tcg_temp_new();
>   
> -    t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -    t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -
>       tcg_gen_andi_i32(addr, src, ~15);
> -    tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(t0, addr, index, MO_TEUQ);
> -    tcg_gen_addi_i32(addr, addr, 8);
> -    tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(t1, addr, index, MO_TEUQ);
> +    tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i128(t, addr, index, mop);
>   
>       tcg_gen_andi_i32(addr, dst, ~15);
> -    tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64(t0, addr, index, MO_TEUQ);
> -    tcg_gen_addi_i32(addr, addr, 8);
> -    tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64(t1, addr, index, MO_TEUQ);
> +    tcg_gen_st_i128(t, addr, index);

Aside from the typo, the other thing you need to consider when introducing 16-byte 
operations is the atomicity.  Do you want or need this to be atomic?

For m68k, I strongly suspect that we don't need the entire read or write to be atomic.

The manual says "burst reads and writes" without defining those terms.  I suspect that 
MO_ATOM_NONE is sufficient, but MO_ATOM_IFALIGN_PAIR would preserve the atomicity of the 
current code.


r~



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 12:27 [RFC PATCH] target/m68k: Use i128 for 128-bit load/store in m68k_copy_line() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-17 13:44 ` Richard Henderson
2023-10-17 13:52 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2023-10-30 13:51   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c85fc54-3933-4330-a378-c1b444b0771f@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).