Re: [Qemu-devel] nvml test failures with QEMU nvdimm device

qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, yuhuang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] nvml test failures with QEMU nvdimm device
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:31:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cb6bea7-24b4-5843-5de3-f2d6a304cb14@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160817160428.GA10108@stefanha-x1.localdomain>


Stefan,

I am digging into it.

On 08/18/2016 12:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Hi,
> Several nvml test suite failures were found with QEMU's nvdimm device.
> They don't look immediately obvious to me so I'm posting them for
> discussion.
>
> The majority of tests are passing.  The failure logs are below.
>
> Full details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365721
>
> Stefan
> ---
>
> # ./RUNTESTS pmem_is_pmem
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: SETUP (check/pmem/debug)
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: START: pmem_is_pmem
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 crashed (signal 6). err1.log below.
> {pmem_is_pmem.c:91 main} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: Error: assertion failure: ret[0] (0x1) == ret[i] (0x0)
> {ut_backtrace.c:193 ut_sighandler} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1:
>
> {ut_backtrace.c:194 ut_sighandler} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: Signal 6, backtrace:
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 0: ./pmem_is_pmem() [0x404293]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 1: ./pmem_is_pmem() [0x404388]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 2: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x35250) [0x7f5bbab7f250]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 3: /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x37) [0x7f5bbab7f1d7]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 4: /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x148) [0x7f5bbab808c8]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 5: ./pmem_is_pmem() [0x402c31]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 6: ./pmem_is_pmem() [0x401bdf]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 7: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f5bbab6bb35]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: 8: ./pmem_is_pmem() [0x401809]
> {ut_backtrace.c:196 ut_sighandler} pmem_is_pmem/TEST1:
>
> out1.log below.
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 out1.log pmem_is_pmem/TEST1: START: pmem_is_pmem
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 out1.log  ./pmem_is_pmem /mnt/pmem/test_pmem_is_pmem1/testfile1
>
> pmem1.log below.
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <1> [out.c:241 out_init] pid 710: program: /home/src/nvml/src/test/pmem_is_pmem/pmem_is_pmem
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <1> [out.c:243 out_init] libpmem version 1.0
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <1> [out.c:244 out_init] src version SRCVERSION:1.1-313-gcfddcb2
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [mmap.c:59 util_mmap_init]
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [libpmem.c:56 libpmem_init]
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:1162 pmem_init]
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:1100 pmem_get_cpuinfo] clflush supported
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:1132 pmem_get_cpuinfo] using clflush
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:1137 pmem_get_cpuinfo] movnt supported
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:1149 pmem_get_cpuinfo] using movnt
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:455 pmem_is_pmem_init]
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem.c:455 pmem_is_pmem_init]
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 0
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 1
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 0
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [pmem_linux.c:135 is_pmem_proc] returning 0
> pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 pmem1.log <libpmem>: <3> [libpmem.c:69 libpmem_fini]
>
> RUNTESTS: stopping: pmem_is_pmem/TEST1 failed, TEST=check FS=pmem BUILD=debug
>
> # ./RUNTESTS obj_tx_add_range
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST0: SETUP (check/pmem/debug)
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST0: START: obj_tx_add_range
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST0: PASS
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST1: SKIP not compiled with support for Valgrind pmemcheck
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST2: SETUP (check/pmem/debug)
> obj_tx_add_range/TEST2: START: obj_tx_add_range
> RUNTESTS: stopping: obj_tx_add_range/TEST2 timed out, TEST=check FS=pmem BUILD=debug
>
>
> # ./RUNTESTS obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/pmem/debug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/pmem/nondebug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/pmem/static-debug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/pmem/static-nondebug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/non-pmem/debug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/non-pmem/nondebug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/non-pmem/static-debug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: PASS
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: SETUP (check/non-pmem/static-nondebug)
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0 crashed (signal 6). err0.log below.
> {obj_pool_lock.c:97 test_open_in_different_process} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: Error: create: Resource temporarily unavailable
> {ut_backtrace.c:193 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0:
>
> {ut_backtrace.c:194 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: Signal 6, backtrace:
> {obj_pool_lock.c:90 test_open_in_different_process} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: Error: pmemobj_open after fork failed but for unexpected reason: Invalid argument
> {ut_backtrace.c:193 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0:
>
> {ut_backtrace.c:194 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: Signal 6, backtrace:
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 0: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4187ca]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 1: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4188bf]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 2: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x35250) [0x7f0782b09250]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 3: /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x37) [0x7f0782b091d7]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 4: /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x148) [0x7f0782b0a8c8]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 5: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x417241]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 6: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4031aa]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 7: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4032ed]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 8: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f0782af5b35]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 9: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x402e92]
> {ut_backtrace.c:196 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0:
>
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 0: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4187ca]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 1: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4188bf]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 2: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x35250) [0x7f0782b09250]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 3: /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x37) [0x7f0782b091d7]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 4: /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x148) [0x7f0782b0a8c8]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 5: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x417241]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 6: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x40315c]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 7: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x4032ed]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 8: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f0782af5b35]
> {ut_backtrace.c:144 ut_dump_backtrace} obj_pool_lock/TEST0: 9: ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug() [0x402e92]
> {ut_backtrace.c:196 ut_sighandler} obj_pool_lock/TEST0:
>
> out0.log below.
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0 out0.log obj_pool_lock/TEST0: START: obj_pool_lock
> obj_pool_lock/TEST0 out0.log  ./obj_pool_lock.static-nondebug /tmp/test_obj_pool_lock0/testfile
>
> RUNTESTS: stopping: obj_pool_lock/TEST0 failed, TEST=check FS=non-pmem BUILD=static-nondebug
>

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-18 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-17 16:04 [Qemu-devel] nvml test failures with QEMU nvdimm device Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-08-18 12:31 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-08-19 13:48   ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8cb6bea7-24b4-5843-5de3-f2d6a304cb14@linux.intel.com \
    --to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuhuang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).