From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRWio-0003vX-O0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:11:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRWio-0003vL-F9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:11:46 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRWio-0003vI-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:11:46 -0500 Received: from [64.233.170.204] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CRWaD-0006JT-Im for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:02:53 -0500 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so51271rna for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:02:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d158e1f0411090602692ddc9a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:02:52 +0100 From: Patrick Ale Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Compiling the CVS tree In-Reply-To: <20041109132037.GB7687@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8d158e1f041109021823baeab5@mail.gmail.com> <20041109132037.GB7687@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Reply-To: Patrick Ale , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: jbrown106@swift-mail.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:20:37 -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote: > > That would be /lib/libc.so.6 ... except that this is not missing. The message > is a warning (which is why it says "warning:") not an error. Does this actually > cause make to abort or something? Because it shouldn't. (I get this error too > when compiling qemu-fast but qemu-fast still works fine. It would just stop > working if I upgraded (or downgraded) glibc.) No actually this was the first warning/error I got followed by some SDL errors. I thought they had to do with eachother but obviously they didnt. I did a ./configure --target-list=i386-softmmu followed by a make and now it does work. Thanks for pointing me out to the FAQ, I totaly overread that on the site, maybe it's time for new glasses or less coffee ;-) Cheers, Patrick