qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] virtio-blk: add vq_rq[] bounds check in virtio_blk_dma_restart_cb()
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:09:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d2043e5-698c-464b-a63c-5f1cb187ff6e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205172659.476970-4-stefanha@redhat.com>

On 05.02.24 18:26, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com> noted that the array index in
> virtio_blk_dma_restart_cb() is not bounds-checked:
>
>    g_autofree VirtIOBlockReq **vq_rq = g_new0(VirtIOBlockReq *, num_queues);
>    ...
>    while (rq) {
>        VirtIOBlockReq *next = rq->next;
>        uint16_t idx = virtio_get_queue_index(rq->vq);
>
>        rq->next = vq_rq[idx];
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> The code is correct because both rq->vq and vq_rq[] depend on
> num_queues, but this is indirect and not 100% obvious. Add an assertion.
>
> Suggested-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>   hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05 17:26 [PATCH 0/5] virtio-blk: iothread-vq-mapping cleanups Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] virtio-blk: enforce iothread-vq-mapping validation Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06  7:29   ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-02-06 15:18     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06 15:07   ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-02-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] virtio-blk: clarify that there is at least 1 virtqueue Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06  7:23   ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-02-06 15:08   ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-02-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] virtio-blk: add vq_rq[] bounds check in virtio_blk_dma_restart_cb() Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06  7:20   ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-02-06 15:09   ` Hanna Czenczek [this message]
2024-02-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio-blk: declare VirtIOBlock::rq with a type Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06  7:16   ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-02-06 15:10   ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-02-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] monitor: use aio_co_reschedule_self() Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-02-06  7:28   ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-02-06 15:11   ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-02-07  7:04   ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d2043e5-698c-464b-a63c-5f1cb187ff6e@redhat.com \
    --to=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).