From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] coroutine/rwlock: Wake writers in preference to readers
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:06:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8de7f2e6-825f-a803-cf12-870559b5e787@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309102157.365356-5-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
On 09/03/21 11:21, David Edmondson wrote:
> - /* The critical section started in qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock. */
> - qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&lock->queue);
> + /* The critical section started in qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock or
> + * qemu_co_rwlock_upgrade.
> + */
> + qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&lock->wqueue);
> + qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&lock->rqueue);
Hmm, the devil is in the details---this is a thundering herd waiting to
happen. But fortunately this can be fixed while making the unlock
primitive even simpler:
if (lock->reader) {
self->locks_held--;
/* Read-side critical sections do not keep lock->mutex. */
qemu_co_mutex_lock(&lock->mutex);
lock->reader--;
assert(lock->reader >= 0);
}
/* If there are no remaining readers wake one waiting writer
* or all waiting readers.
*/
if (!lock->reader && !qemu_co_queue_next(&lock->wqueue)) {
assert(!lock->pending_writer);
qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&lock->rqueue);
}
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 10:21 [RFC PATCH 0/4] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer David Edmondson
2021-03-09 11:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 11:58 ` David Edmondson
2021-03-09 12:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 13:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 11:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] coroutine/rwlock: Wake writers in preference to readers David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-09 11:57 ` David Edmondson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8de7f2e6-825f-a803-cf12-870559b5e787@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).