From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebqY0-0008Pz-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:26:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebqXy-0000W8-SO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:26:44 -0500 References: <20171211134740.8235-1-david@redhat.com> <20171211134740.8235-14-david@redhat.com> <20180109183230.5dfae15e.cohuck@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <8e09e044-2689-c510-cfa1-30c8f393726c@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:26:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180109183230.5dfae15e.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 for-2-12 13/15] s390x/tcg: STSI overhaul List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Thomas Huth , Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson >> +union sysib { >> + struct sysib_111 sysib_111; >> + struct sysib_121 sysib_121; >> + struct sysib_122 sysib_122; >> + struct sysib_221 sysib_221; >> + struct sysib_222 sysib_222; >> + struct sysib_322 sysib_322; >> +}; > > Wondering whether you should add some typedefery to make this more > qemu-y. I'll include that in the previous patch. (typedef ... ) Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb