qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Nina Schoetterl-Glausch" <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:15:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e4e84fc-2602-87da-99fc-3ee148d253a9@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bc361f6675ea9d8332131725cb5d778aa32e8bd.camel@linux.ibm.com>


On 4/11/23 14:27, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 16:04 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 4/4/23 14:35, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * CPU Topology
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
>>>>> Shouldn't we have some range : 2022-2023 ?
>>>> There was a discussion on this in the first spins, I think to
>>>> remember that Nina wanted 22 and Thomas 23,
>>>>
>>>> now we have a third opinion :) .
>>>>
>>>> I must say that all three have their reasons and I take what the
>>>> majority wants.
>>> There is an internal IBM document describing the copyright tags. If I
>>> recall
>>> well, first date is the first year the code was officially published,
>>> second
>>> year is the last year it was modified (so last commit of the year). Or
>>> something like that and it's theory, because we tend to forget.
>>>
>>> For an example, see the OPAL FW https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/,
>>> and run :
>>>
>>>    "grep Copyright.*IBM" in the OPAL FW
>>
>> OK for me, it looks logical, and all three of you are right then.
>>
>> So I will use
>>
>> Copyright IBM Corp. 2022-2023
> You should use a comma instead of a hyphen as per IBM policy.
> I.e. 2022, 2023


OK, thanks.

Regards,

Pierre





  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-03 16:28 [PATCH v19 00/21] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:03   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:26     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-04 12:35       ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 14:04         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-11 12:27           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-17  9:15             ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-04-18 15:57       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-19  9:46         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18  8:53   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-18 10:01     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 10:15       ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-18 12:28         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 12:38       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-18 13:52         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 14:58           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 02/21] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:31   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 11:39     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-19 17:15     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-20  8:59   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-21 10:20     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-24 15:32       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25  8:45         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25  9:27           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25 11:24             ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 04/21] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 05/21] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:41   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04  9:07     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 07/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 08/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 09/21] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 10/21] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 11/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 12/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 13/21] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 17:00   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-03 17:21     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:21   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:17     ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-25 15:03     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 15/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:22   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:26     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:19   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:02     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 18/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 19/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 20/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 21/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology query-cpu-polarization Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8e4e84fc-2602-87da-99fc-3ee148d253a9@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).