From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJQkn-0007qL-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:20:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJQdW-0002QH-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:12:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJQdW-0002N1-Dn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:12:50 -0500 References: <20181102034649.43559-1-liran.alon@oracle.com> <12c26c34-8dd1-a442-7826-86b93ff978f8@redhat.com> <20181102123504.GA2387@work-vm> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <8f689c05-350b-b9b3-2c62-e7a54c85af7d@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 23:12:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181102123504.GA2387@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [QEMU PATCH v2 0/2]: KVM: i386: Add support for save and restore nested state List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Liran Alon , jmattson@google.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/11/2018 13:35, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> >> Personally, I would like to say that, starting from QEMU 3.2, enabling >> nested VMX requires a 4.20 kernel. It's a bit bold, but I think it's a >> good way to keep some sanity. Any opinions on that? > That seems a bit mean; there's a lot of people already using nested. True. However, a more complete version of the "plan" is that they could continue using it, but only with a pre-3.2 machine type. Paolo