qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_read/write() calls
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 16:04:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9052ebc9-190c-48e2-bc4f-a4339e7692a9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002091132.65703-4-philmd@linaro.org>

On 02/10/2025 11.11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> cpu_physical_memory_read() and cpu_physical_memory_write() are
> legacy (see commit b7ecba0f6f6), replace by address_space_read()
> and address_space_write() respectively.

I'm not sure whether this patch is a good idea in the current way it is done.

Commit b7ecba0f6f6 says: "there is likely to be behaviour you need to model 
correctly for a failed read or write operation" ... so if we switch to the 
address_space_* API, I think you should also implement the correct handling 
for the case where the memory transaction failed. Otherwise this is more or 
less just code churn, isn't it?

  Thomas

> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index c2fedc55213..737c3bbc5be 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>   #include "s390x-internal.h"
>   #include "hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h"
>   #include "system/cpus.h"
> +#include "system/memory.h"
>   #include "hw/s390x/ipl.h"
>   #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>   #include "system/kvm.h"
> @@ -82,11 +83,14 @@ static bool diag_iplb_read(IplParameterBlock *iplb, S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr)
>           }
>           s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>       } else {
> -        cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> +        const MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED;
> +        AddressSpace *as = CPU(cpu)->as;
> +
> +        address_space_read(as, addr, attrs, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
>           if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
>               return false;
>           }
> -        cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> +        address_space_read(as, addr, attrs, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>       }
>       return true;
>   }
> @@ -98,7 +102,10 @@ static void diag_iplb_write(IplParameterBlock *iplb, S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr
>       if (s390_is_pv()) {
>           s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, iplb, iplb_len);
>       } else {
> -        cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, iplb_len);
> +        const MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED;
> +        AddressSpace *as = CPU(cpu)->as;
> +
> +        address_space_write(as, addr, attrs, iplb, iplb_len);
>       }
>   }
>   



  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02  9:11 [PATCH 0/9] target/s390x: Remove legacy cpu_physical_memory_*() calls Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] target/s390x: Factor diag_iplb_write() out Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 13:55   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] target/s390x: Factor diag_iplb_read() out Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 13:57   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_read/write() calls Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:04   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-10-06 14:44     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (1/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] target/s390x: Propagate CPUS390XState to cpu_unmap_lowcore() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:08   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (2/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:09   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] target/s390x: Reduce s390_store_adtl_status() scope Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:11   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] target/s390x: Reduce s390_store_status() scope Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:16   ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02  9:11 ` [PATCH 9/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (3/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9052ebc9-190c-48e2-bc4f-a4339e7692a9@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).