From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JwIwU-0004kW-CE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JwIwT-0004k6-MT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34505 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JwIwT-0004k3-Jz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:57 -0400 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.152]:10940) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JwIwT-0006WR-FP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:57 -0400 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1920149ywa.82 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 08:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <90eb1dc70805140830w76ed3b17v92f66be45b1845e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:30:54 -0500 From: "Javier Guerra" Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add support for a configuration file In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1210713545-11916-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <482ABF6E.6090100@qumranet.com> <482ADA80.3000309@bellard.org> <200805141526.34293.paul@codesourcery.com> <90eb1dc70805140745t61c01ee6w1d9478b02bce3e03@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote: > > What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org) > > > > it started up as a configuration language, and evolved into a full > > programming language, while remaining _very_ light (less than 200K > > with all libraries), and wonderfully easy to embed into C programs. > > Okay, so much for the upsides. Now for the downsides: a language that > nearly nobody knows, for something that is not meant to be executed (think > security implications). when embedded, you get to choose what libraries are available. there are several examples of fairly secure settings. personally, i find shell scripts enough for setting up parameters. a static config wouldn't bring much advantages. -- Javier