From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L15Qe-0005v1-LO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:38:08 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L15Qd-0005up-E8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:38:08 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46770 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L15Qd-0005um-AW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:38:07 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55125)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <herbszt@gmx.de>) id 1L15Qc-00031L-Ng
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:38:07 -0500
Message-ID: <912FB9DCFCD04BBC92EFE226ADEB1A58@FSCPC>
From: "Sebastian Herbszt" <herbszt@gmx.de>
References: <20081110091134.11822.34230.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local>
	<20081110091139.11822.11686.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local>
	<7D8EE33FCAD549D69512E10A103EDA15@FSCPC>
	<004d01c945c4$2a561180$7f023480$@com>
	<491C876D.3010003@codemonkey.ws> <20081114094727.GA6059@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081114094727.GA6059@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RE: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH v3 1/6] Move
	PICinitialization out ofline to save space in post code area.
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:36:31 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:00:45PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> What's the status of this patch series?  Are there particular patches  
>> that haven't made it into upstream Bochs yet that requiring refactoring?  
> Most of them are not yet upstream, but as far as I know there are no
> outstanding issues that need to be addressed.
> 
>> Are there things that we should take in the bios.diff?  Until the Bochs 
>> folks get around to applying?
> I think Sebastian wants to check the patches with Bochs, but Bochs had a
> bug that prevented him from doing it. The bug should have been fixed
> today, so lets wait a little bit more for Bochs merge. Sebastian is this
> description accurate?

It is correct.

- Sebastian