From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] vhost: Remove vhost_backend_can_merge() callback
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:24:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9159ed0c-4d09-a633-813c-11b8c72fbf9b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230307121644.755438a3@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com>
On 07.03.23 12:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:25:48 +0100
> Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:47:52 +0100
>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Checking whether the memory regions are equal is sufficient: if they are
>>> equal, then most certainly the contained fd is equal.
>> sounds reasonable to me.
>>
>>>
>>> The whole vhost-user memslot handling is suboptimal and overly
>>> complicated. We shouldn't have to lookup a RAM memory regions we got
>>> notified about in vhost_user_get_mr_data() using a host pointer. But that
>>
>> While on janitor duty can you fixup following?
>>
>> vhost_user_get_mr_data() -> memory_region_from_host ->
>> -> qemu_ram_block_from_host()
>> for qemu_ram_block_from_host doc comment seems to out of
>> sync (ram_addr not longer exists)
>>
>>> requires a bigger rework -- especially an alternative vhost_set_mem_table()
>>> backend call that simply consumes MemoryRegionSections.
>>
>> just skimming through usage of vhost_user_get_mr_data() it looks like
>> we are first collecting MemoryRegionSection-s into tmp_sections
>> then we do vhost_commit we convert then into vhost_memory_region list
>> and the we are trying hard to convert addresses from the later
>> to back to MemoryRegions we've lost during tmp_sections conversion
>> all over the place.
>>
>> To me it looks like we should drop conversion to vhost_dev::mem
>> and replace its usage with vhost_dev::mem_sections directly
>> to get rid of data duplication and back and forth addr<->mr conversion.
>>
>>> For now, let's just drop vhost_backend_can_merge().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 14 --------------
>>> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 1 -
>>> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 6 +-----
>>> include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h | 4 ----
>>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
>>> index e68daa35d4..4bfaf559a7 100644
>>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
>>> @@ -2195,19 +2195,6 @@ static int vhost_user_migration_done(struct vhost_dev *dev, char* mac_addr)
>>> return -ENOTSUP;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static bool vhost_user_can_merge(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>>> - uint64_t start1, uint64_t size1,
>>> - uint64_t start2, uint64_t size2)
>>> -{
>>> - ram_addr_t offset;
>>> - int mfd, rfd;
>>> -
>>> - (void)vhost_user_get_mr_data(start1, &offset, &mfd);
>>> - (void)vhost_user_get_mr_data(start2, &offset, &rfd);
>>> -
>>> - return mfd == rfd;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static int vhost_user_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
>>> {
>>> VhostUserMsg msg;
>>> @@ -2704,7 +2691,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
>>> .vhost_set_vring_enable = vhost_user_set_vring_enable,
>>> .vhost_requires_shm_log = vhost_user_requires_shm_log,
>>> .vhost_migration_done = vhost_user_migration_done,
>>> - .vhost_backend_can_merge = vhost_user_can_merge,
>>> .vhost_net_set_mtu = vhost_user_net_set_mtu,
>>> .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback,
>>> .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg,
>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>>> index 542e003101..9ab7bc8718 100644
>>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>>> @@ -1317,7 +1317,6 @@ const VhostOps vdpa_ops = {
>>> .vhost_set_config = vhost_vdpa_set_config,
>>> .vhost_requires_shm_log = NULL,
>>> .vhost_migration_done = NULL,
>>> - .vhost_backend_can_merge = NULL,
>>> .vhost_net_set_mtu = NULL,
>>> .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = NULL,
>>> .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = NULL,
>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> index b7fb960fa9..9d8662aa98 100644
>>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> @@ -733,11 +733,7 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>>> size_t offset = mrs_gpa - prev_gpa_start;
>>>
>>> if (prev_host_start + offset == mrs_host &&
>>> - section->mr == prev_sec->mr &&
>>> - (!dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_can_merge ||
>>> - dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_can_merge(dev,
>
> another question, can it relly happen, i.e. having 2 abut memory sections
> with the same memory region, is yes then when/why?
Unfortunately yet, because vhost relies on some hacks (sorry, but
that's what it is) to make huge pages work. The following commit
contains some details:
commit 76525114736e8f669766e69b715fa59ce8648aae
Author: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jan 16 20:24:14 2020 +0000
vhost: Only align sections for vhost-user
I added hugepage alignment code in c1ece84e7c9 to deal with
vhost-user + postcopy which needs aligned pages when using userfault.
However, on x86 the lower 2MB of address space tends to be shotgun'd
with small fragments around the 512-640k range - e.g. video RAM, and
with HyperV synic pages tend to sit around there - again splitting
it up. The alignment code complains with a 'Section rounded to ...'
error and gives up.
Otherwise it wouldn't be needed, because flatview simplification code already
merges what's reasonable.
[I'll reply to you pother mail regarding that shortly]
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 11:47 [PATCH v1 0/2] vhost: memslot handling improvements David Hildenbrand
2023-02-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] vhost: Defer filtering memory sections until building the vhost memory structure David Hildenbrand
2023-02-16 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-16 12:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-16 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-16 12:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-16 12:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-16 12:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-07 10:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-03-07 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-08 12:30 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-03-08 15:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] vhost: Remove vhost_backend_can_merge() callback David Hildenbrand
2023-03-07 10:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-03-07 11:16 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-03-07 11:24 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-02-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] vhost: memslot handling improvements Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-02-17 13:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-17 14:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-17 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-07 11:14 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-03-08 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9159ed0c-4d09-a633-813c-11b8c72fbf9b@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).