From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Dan Hoffman <dhoff749@gmail.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: fix short-circuit logic with non-optimizing builds
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:20:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9282a606-794a-432c-8b56-fedf6af67768@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120042116-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
(Cc'ing Eric)
On 20/11/23 10:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 07:34:58PM -0600, Dan Hoffman wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, yes. Any optimization level above O0 does not have this
>> issue (on this version of Clang, at least)
>
> Aha, this is with -O0. That makes sense.
But then, why the other cases aren't problematic?
$ git grep -E ' (&&|\|\|) !?kvm_enabled'
hw/arm/boot.c:1228: assert(!(info->secure_board_setup && kvm_enabled()));
hw/i386/microvm.c:270: (mms->rtc == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO &&
!kvm_enabled())) {
hw/i386/x86.c:135: if (x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 && kvm_enabled() &&
hw/mips/cps.c:62: return is_mt && !kvm_enabled();
system/physmem.c:760: assert(asidx == 0 || !kvm_enabled());
target/arm/cpu64.c:288: if (value && kvm_enabled() &&
!kvm_arm_sve_supported()) {
target/i386/cpu.c:7264: if (requested_lbr_fmt && kvm_enabled()) {
target/ppc/kvm.c:345: if (!cpu->hash64_opts || !kvm_enabled()) {
target/s390x/cpu_models.c:574: if (xcc->kvm_required && !kvm_enabled()) {
target/s390x/cpu_models_sysemu.c:124: if
(S390_CPU_CLASS(oc)->kvm_required && !kvm_enabled()) {
> We have:
> ;;
> --enable-debug)
> # Enable debugging options that aren't excessively noisy
> meson_option_parse --enable-debug-tcg ""
> meson_option_parse --enable-debug-graph-lock ""
> meson_option_parse --enable-debug-mutex ""
> meson_option_add -Doptimization=0
> default_cflags='-O0 -g'
>
>
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 4:54 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19/11/23 21:31, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
>> > `kvm_enabled()` is compiled down to `0` and short-circuit logic is
>> > used to remove references to undefined symbols at the compile stage.
>> > Some build configurations with some compilers don't attempt to
>> > simplify this logic down in some cases (the pattern appears to be
>> > that the literal false must be the first term) and this was causing
>> > some builds to emit references to undefined symbols.
>> >
>> > An example of such a configuration is clang 16.0.6 with the following
>> > configure: ./configure --enable-debug --without-default-features
>> > --target-list=x86_64-softmmu --enable-tcg-interpreter
>>
>> Is the '--enable-debug' option triggering this?
>>
>> I'm surprised the order of conditions matters for code elision...
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Hoffman <dhoff749@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > hw/i386/x86.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
>> > index b3d054889bb..2b6291ad8d5 100644
>> > --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
>> > +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
>> > @@ -131,8 +131,12 @@ void x86_cpus_init(X86MachineState *x86ms, int
>> default_cpu_version)
>> > /*
>> > * Can we support APIC ID 255 or higher? With KVM, that requires
>> > * both in-kernel lapic and X2APIC userspace API.
>> > + *
>> > + * kvm_enabled() must go first to ensure that kvm_* references are
>> > + * not emitted for the linker to consume (kvm_enabled() is
>> > + * a literal `0` in configurations where kvm_* aren't defined)
>> > */
>> > - if (x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 && kvm_enabled() &&
>> > + if (kvm_enabled() && x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 &&
>> > (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() || !kvm_enable_x2apic())) {
>> > error_report("current -smp configuration requires kernel "
>> > "irqchip and X2APIC API support.");
>> > @@ -418,8 +422,13 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
>> > }
>> > cpu->thread_id = topo_ids.smt_id;
>> >
>> > - if (hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, HYPERV_FEAT_VPINDEX) &&
>> > - kvm_enabled() && !kvm_hv_vpindex_settable()) {
>> > + /*
>> > + * kvm_enabled() must go first to ensure that kvm_* references are
>> > + * not emitted for the linker to consume (kvm_enabled() is
>> > + * a literal `0` in configurations where kvm_* aren't defined)
>> > + */
>> > + if (kvm_enabled() && hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, HYPERV_FEAT_VPINDEX) &
>> &
>> > + !kvm_hv_vpindex_settable()) {
>> > error_setg(errp, "kernel doesn't allow setting HyperV
>> VP_INDEX");
>> > return;
>> > }
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-19 20:31 [PATCH v3] hw/i386: fix short-circuit logic with non-optimizing builds Daniel Hoffman
2023-11-19 22:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-11-20 1:34 ` Dan Hoffman
2023-11-20 9:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-20 10:20 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-11-20 15:30 ` Richard Henderson
2023-11-21 16:15 ` Eric Blake
2023-11-21 18:28 ` Dan Hoffman
2023-11-22 1:24 ` Dan Hoffman
2023-11-23 18:03 ` Dan Hoffman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9282a606-794a-432c-8b56-fedf6af67768@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=dhoff749@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).