From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Bulekov" <alxndr@bu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] softmmu: Use memmove in flatview_write_continue
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:15:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92bd7f1b-e7a5-f3a8-2838-8eae8af8110b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131030155.18932-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
On 31.01.23 04:01, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> We found a case where the source passed to flatview_write_continue() may
> overlap with the destination when fuzzing igb, a new proposed network
> device with sanitizers.
>
> igb uses pci_dma_map() to get Tx packet, and pci_dma_write() to write Rx
> buffer. While pci_dma_write() is usually used to write data from
> memory not mapped to the guest, if igb is configured to perform
> loopback, the data will be sourced from the guest memory. The source and
> destination can overlap and the usage of memcpy() will be invalid in
> such a case.
>
> While we do not really have to deal with such an invalid request for
> igb, detecting the overlap in igb code beforehand requires complex code,
> and only covers this specific case. Instead, just replace memcpy() with
> memmove() to tolerate overlaps. Using memmove() will slightly damage the
> performance as it will need to check overlaps before using SIMD
> instructions for copying, but the cost should be negligible, considering
> the inherent complexity of flatview_write_continue().
>
> The test cases generated by the fuzzer is available at:
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230129053316.1071513-1-alxndr@bu.edu/
>
> The fixed test case is:
> fuzz/crash_47dfe62d9f911bf523ff48cd441b61c0013ed805
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> Acked-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 3:01 [PATCH v2] softmmu: Use memmove in flatview_write_continue Akihiko Odaki
2023-01-31 8:15 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-02-23 21:32 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92bd7f1b-e7a5-f3a8-2838-8eae8af8110b@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).