From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Ashijeet Acharya <ashijeetacharya@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ide: Fix memory leak in ide_register_restart_cb()
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:38:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92cfa23c-43d7-3212-42f0-5f9ca85c163e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC2QTZbLJ+xWRsGVhjqvd77cw0EstDJAAW77NWw=5PuVhPea5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/22/2016 01:47 AM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:08 AM, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/21/2016 01:53 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>>>
>>> Fix a memory leak in ide_register_restart_cb() in hw/ide/core.c and add
>>> idebus_unrealize() in hw/ide/qdev.c to have calls to
>>> qemu_del_vm_change_state_handler() to deal with the dangling change
>>> state handler during hot-unplugging ide devices which might lead to a
>>> crash.
>>>
>>
>> Minor rebase issue, but it's trivially resolved.
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ashijeet Acharya <ashijeetacharya@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> -v1 was corrupted at line 64
>>> -Move idebus_unrealize() below ide_bus_class_init()
>>> ---
>>> hw/ide/core.c | 2 +-
>>> hw/ide/qdev.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> include/hw/ide/internal.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
>>> index 45b6df1..eecbb47 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ide/core.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ide/core.c
>>> @@ -2582,7 +2582,7 @@ static void ide_restart_cb(void *opaque, int
>>> running, RunState state)
>>> void ide_register_restart_cb(IDEBus *bus)
>>> {
>>> if (bus->dma->ops->restart_dma) {
>>> - qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(ide_restart_cb, bus);
>>> + bus->vmstate = qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(ide_restart_cb,
>>> bus);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ide/qdev.c b/hw/ide/qdev.c
>>> index 2eb055a..c94f9f8 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ide/qdev.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ide/qdev.c
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>> /* --------------------------------- */
>>>
>>> static char *idebus_get_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *dev);
>>> +static void idebus_unrealize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp);
>>>
>>> static Property ide_props[] = {
>>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("unit", IDEDevice, unit, -1),
>>> @@ -44,6 +45,17 @@ static void ide_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
>>> *data)
>>> k->get_fw_dev_path = idebus_get_fw_dev_path;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void idebus_unrealize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + IDEBus *bus = DO_UPCAST(IDEBus, qbus, qdev->parent_bus);
>>> +
>>> + if (bus->dma->ops->restart_dma) {
>>> + if (bus->vmstate) {
>>> + qemu_del_vm_change_state_handler(bus->vmstate);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>>
>> Naive question: I saw Paolo say that this should be conditional on
>> bus->dma->ops->restart_dma -- Why can't we just say if (bus->vmstate) ?
>>
>> I see that we only allocate the change state handler when restart_dma is
>> present, but this makes this portion of the code look funny when if
>> (bus->vmstate) would be just as simple, no?
>>
>
> I had a similar thought, because other pieces of code also do it in
> "if (bus->vmstate)" manner but maybe I was missing on something
> important and ended up coding how Paolo instructed me.
>
I think we can use the smaller conditional -- less prone to error that
way in case we change the conditional on how it was constructed. Let's
do that and I'll merge this for you finally.
>> (Unless we can't rely on its NULL initialization or some such.)
>
> Maybe, but shouldn't the same logic apply elsewhere then?
>
>>
>>> static const TypeInfo ide_bus_info = {
>>> .name = TYPE_IDE_BUS,
>>> .parent = TYPE_BUS,
>>> @@ -355,6 +367,7 @@ static void ide_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
>>> void *data)
>>> k->init = ide_qdev_init;
>>> set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_STORAGE, k->categories);
>>> k->bus_type = TYPE_IDE_BUS;
>>> + k->unrealize = idebus_unrealize;
>>> k->props = ide_props;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ide/internal.h b/include/hw/ide/internal.h
>>> index 7824bc3..2103261 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/ide/internal.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/ide/internal.h
>>> @@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ struct IDEBus {
>>> uint8_t retry_unit;
>>> int64_t retry_sector_num;
>>> uint32_t retry_nsector;
>>> + VMChangeStateEntry *vmstate;
>>
>>
>> Hmm, I was going to complain and say that 'vmstate' is a generic name for
>> this field, but it's by far the most common name for this task. I cede!
>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define TYPE_IDE_DEVICE "ide-device"
>>>
>>
>> Seems good otherwise, thank you!
> Thanks!
>
> Ashijeet
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 17:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ide: Fix memory leak in ide_register_restart_cb() Ashijeet Acharya
2016-09-21 19:38 ` John Snow
2016-09-22 5:47 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-09-27 16:38 ` John Snow [this message]
2016-09-27 16:44 ` Ashijeet Acharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92cfa23c-43d7-3212-42f0-5f9ca85c163e@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=ashijeetacharya@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).