Re: [PATCH] bugfix: irq: Avoid covering object refcount of qemu_irq

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 27/07/2020 16.41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 14:03, Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Avoid covering object refcount of qemu_irq, otherwise it may causes
>> memory leak.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/core/irq.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/core/irq.c b/hw/core/irq.c
>> index fb3045b912..59af4dfc74 100644
>> --- a/hw/core/irq.c
>> +++ b/hw/core/irq.c
>> @@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ void qemu_irq_intercept_in(qemu_irq *gpio_in, qemu_irq_handler handler, int n)
>>      int i;
>>      qemu_irq *old_irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(NULL, NULL, n);
>>      for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>> -        *old_irqs[i] = *gpio_in[i];
>> +        old_irqs[i]->handler = gpio_in[i]->handler;
>> +        old_irqs[i]->opaque = gpio_in[i]->opaque;
>> +
>>          gpio_in[i]->handler = handler;
>>          gpio_in[i]->opaque = &old_irqs[i];
>>      }
> 
> This function is leaky by design, because it doesn't do anything
> with the old_irqs array and there's no function for un-intercepting
> the IRQs (which would need to free that memory). This is not ideal
> but OK because it's only used in the test suite.

I think this could better be done without calling qemu_allocate_irqs():
Simply call qemu_allocate_irq() (without "s" at the end) within the
for-loop for each irq instead. What do you think?

 Thomas