qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/bcm283x: Fix crash with device_add bcm2837 on unsupported machines
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:21:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <931c0545-e3d8-fc84-9b69-59fab040265c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9GspXJg2ioLrCknBgYHJ9f6qvM=n=y0dLeU12yv_5ETA@mail.gmail.com>

On 10.07.2018 08:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 July 2018 at 23:03, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09.07.2018 23:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 9 July 2018 at 22:03, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> When trying to "device_add bcm2837" on a machine that is not suitable for
>>>> this device, you can quickly crash QEMU afterwards, e.g. with "info qtree":
>>>>
>>>> echo "{'execute':'qmp_capabilities'} {'execute':'device_add', " \
>>>>  "'arguments':{'driver':'bcm2837'}} {'execute': 'human-monitor-command', " \
>>>>  "'arguments': {'command-line': 'info qtree'}}" | \
>>>>  aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -M integratorcp,accel=qtest -S -qmp stdio
>>>>
>>>> {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": {"micro": 50, "minor": 12, "major": 2},
>>>>  "package": "build-all"}, "capabilities": []}}
>>>> {"return": {}}
>>>> {"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Device 'bcm2837' can not be
>>>>  hotplugged on this machine"}}
>>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that qdev_set_parent_bus() from instance_init adds a link
>>>> to the child devices which is not valid anymore after the device init
>>>> failed. Thus the qdev_set_parent_bus() must rather be done in the realize
>>>> function instead.
>>>
>>> Yuck. The real problem here is that we're still requiring the
>>> code that creates these QOM devices to manually set the parent
>>> in the first place. It's not surprising that we don't get it right
>>> (either parenting in the wrong place or not at all). I'd much
>>> rather see us fix that properly than keep papering over places
>>> where we get it wrong.
>>
>> Sorry, I'm still not an expert in all this QOM stuff yet ... so what do
>> you exactly recommend to do instead?
> 
> I'm not clear either, but I don't think that what we're
> currently doing can be right.

Hm, ok, so how to continue here now? Shall we at least mark the
bcm2836/7 devices with user_creatable=false, so that users can not crash
their QEMU so easily with device_add? The problem with introspection via
device-list-properties would still continue to exist, but I think that's
less likely used in practice... otherwise we could still move the
qdev_set_parent_bus() calls to the realize() function instead, and just
add a big fat FIXME comment in front of the code block, so that we
remember to clean that up one day...

 Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-09 21:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/bcm283x: Fix crash with device_add bcm2837 on unsupported machines Thomas Huth
2018-07-09 21:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-09 21:36   ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-09 21:42 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-09 22:03   ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-10  6:50     ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-11  7:21       ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2018-07-11 16:12         ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-11 17:15           ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-12 12:06             ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-12 12:55               ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-12 13:19                 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-12 15:25               ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-12 16:16                 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-12 16:22                   ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-12 16:32                     ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-16  6:41                       ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-11 17:21       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-11 19:04         ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-11 19:59           ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-12  8:04             ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-12 12:04     ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-11 17:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-11 18:30   ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-11 20:16     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-11 20:23       ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-12  8:05         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-12 18:04           ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-16  6:43             ` Markus Armbruster
2018-07-16 14:25               ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-11 18:43   ` Thomas Huth
2018-07-11 20:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-12  5:57       ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=931c0545-e3d8-fc84-9b69-59fab040265c@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).