From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in linuxkerenl.py reported by pylint
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93275cfd-8083-4c75-81f2-46006ee42f00@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57dc76d3-2a2b-428b-a457-94dcd20cb427@linaro.org>
On 22/10/2025 21.14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Typo "linuxkernel" in subject.
>
> On 15/10/25 11:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>
>> Use proper indentation and lazy logging here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tests/functional/qemu_test/linuxkernel.py | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
>> @@ -48,5 +48,5 @@ def check_http_download(self, filename, hashsum,
>> guestport=8080,
>> hl.update(chunk)
>> digest = hl.hexdigest()
>> - self.log.info(f'sha256sum of download is {digest}.')
>> + self.log.info('sha256sum of download is %s.', digest)
>> self.assertEqual(digest, hashsum)
>
> TBH I don't understand why 'lazy logging' is better than f-strings.
If I got this right, it's about a small performance improvement: If the
logging function decides that the log output could be dropped since the
logging level does not match, there is no need to format the string in that
case.
But thinking about this, I guess that's not a valuable argument for the
tests, since we're not calling these functions again and again, so the
performance impact is negligible here. So fine for me if we ignore this
warning from pylint. ... i.e. we might want to introduce a pylintrc file
now, similar to what we have in scripts/qapi/pylintrc or
tests/qemu-iotests/pylintrc already ?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 9:54 [PATCH 0/6] tests/functional: Fix various problems reported by pylint Thomas Huth
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in asset.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in decorators.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:15 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in linuxkerenl.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-23 6:46 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-10-23 15:13 ` John Snow
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in testcase.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-23 4:57 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in uncompress.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-15 9:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] tests/functional: Fix problems in utils.py " Thomas Huth
2025-10-22 19:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93275cfd-8083-4c75-81f2-46006ee42f00@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).