qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: "Jamin Lin" <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Steven Lee" <steven_lee@aspeedtech.com>,
	"Troy Lee" <leetroy@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	"Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>, "Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
	"open list:ASPEED BMCs" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: troy_lee@aspeedtech.com, yunlin.tang@aspeedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] aspeed/soc: introduce a new API to get the INTC orgate information
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:53:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <935912ca-d664-4543-8d82-e8a32ebf78c5@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240808024916.1262715-9-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>

Jamin,

On 8/8/24 04:49, Jamin Lin wrote:
> Currently, users can set the intc mapping table with
> enumerated device id and device irq to get the INTC orgate
> input pins. However, some devices use the continuous bits number in the
> same orgate. To reduce the enumerated device id definition,
> create a new API to get the INTC orgate index and source bit number
> if users only provide the start bus number of device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
>   hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c
> index 4257b5e8af..0bbd66110b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ struct gic_intc_irq_info {
>       const int *ptr;
>   };
>   
> +struct gic_intc_orgate_info {
> +    int index;
> +    int int_num;
> +};
> +
>   static const struct gic_intc_irq_info aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[] = {
>       {128,  aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic128_intcmap},
>       {129,  NULL},
> @@ -193,6 +198,27 @@ static qemu_irq aspeed_soc_ast2700_get_irq(AspeedSoCState *s, int dev)
>       return qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&a->gic), sc->irqmap[dev]);
>   }
>   
> +static void aspeed_soc_ast2700_get_intc_orgate(AspeedSoCState *s, int dev,
> +    struct gic_intc_orgate_info *orgate_info)
> +{
> +    AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap); i++) {
> +        if (sc->irqmap[dev] == aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].irq) {
> +            assert(aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].ptr);
> +            orgate_info->index = i;
> +            orgate_info->int_num = aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].ptr[dev];
> +            return;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Invalid orgate index, device irq should be 128 to 136.
> +     */
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +}
> +
>   static uint64_t aspeed_ram_capacity_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>                                                       unsigned int size)
>   {

Here is a proposal, instead please introduce a routine returning
a qemu_irq like sc->get_irq() does :

   static qemu_irq aspeed_soc_ast2700_get_irq_index(AspeedSoCState *s, int dev,
                                                    int index)
   {
       Aspeed27x0SoCState *a = ASPEED27X0_SOC(s);
       AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
       int i;

       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap); i++) {
           if (sc->irqmap[dev] == aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].irq) {
               assert(aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].ptr);
               return qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&a->intc.orgates[i]),
                    aspeed_soc_ast2700_gic_intcmap[i].ptr[dev] + index);
           }
       }

       /*
        * Invalid orgate index, device irq should be 128 to 136.
        */
       g_assert_not_reached();
   }

and in the next patch, replace

         irq = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&a->intc.orgates[orgate_info.index]),
                                orgate_info.int_num + i);
with

         irq = aspeed_soc_ast2700_get_irq_index(s, ASPEED_DEV_I2C, i);

I think this should be cleaner.

Thanks,

C.




  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-08  2:49 [PATCH v2 00/11] support I2C for AST2700 Jamin Lin via
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: support discontinuous register memory region of I2C bus Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:08   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: introduce a new bus pool buffer attribute in AspeedI2Cbus Jamin Lin via
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: support discontinuous poll buffer memory region of I2C bus Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:08   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: introduce a new dma_dram_offset attribute in AspeedI2Cbus Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:14   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-02 13:22   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-03  2:27     ` Jamin Lin
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: Add AST2700 support Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:14   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: support Tx/Rx buffer 64 bits address Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:26   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-03  2:47     ` Jamin Lin
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] hw/i2c/aspeed: support high part dram offset for DMA 64 bits Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:28   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-03  3:06     ` Jamin Lin
2024-09-03  7:08       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-09-03  7:10         ` Jamin Lin
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] aspeed/soc: introduce a new API to get the INTC orgate information Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 14:53   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-09-03  6:35     ` Jamin Lin
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] aspeed/soc: support I2C for AST2700 Jamin Lin via
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] aspeed: add tmp105 in i2c bus 0 " Jamin Lin via
2024-08-08  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] machine_aspeed.py: update to test I2C " Jamin Lin via
2024-09-02 13:41   ` Cédric Le Goater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=935912ca-d664-4543-8d82-e8a32ebf78c5@kaod.org \
    --to=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=leetroy@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=steven_lee@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=troy_lee@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=yunlin.tang@aspeedtech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).