qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: "Ed Maste" <emaste@freebsd.org>,
	"Yonggang Luo" <luoyonggang@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Li-Wen Hsu" <lwhsu@freebsd.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Cirrus-CI all red
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:15:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <938ec78f-1ca1-f3df-26be-790e53d9cc7e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYpcR/SBHNlqj5CV@redhat.com>

On 09/11/2021 12.32, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:27:42AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:45:18AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 09/11/2021 10.39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> FYI, as of today, the latest merge history is red (last 10 days):
>>>>> https://cirrus-ci.com/github/qemu/qemu
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want to keep using this, we should somehow plug it to
>>>>> GitLab-CI (i.e. Travis-CI is run as an external job there) so
>>>>> the project maintainer can notice job failures.
>>>>
>>>> Well, considering that all the cirrus-run based jobs are currently failing
>>>> due to the non-working API token, that does not seem to work very well
>>>> either.
>>>
>>> Who owns the API token ? For other projects, this was addressed a while
>>> ago by refreshing the token. I would have tried this myself for QEMU
>>> but I don't have privileges on the QEMU projects in github/gitlab.
>>
>> OK I've updated the token (after I figured out the path to it):
>>
>>    - top right, Settings
>>    - scroll to bottom "Your GitHub Organizations"
>>    - click gear icon
>>    - scroll to API settings, click Generate New Token
>>
>> It seems to be triggering the builds now although GitLab still reports
>> failures for some other reason now.
> 
> The cirrus-run image we're using is lockde to version 0.3.0. I'm
> testing an update to version 0.5.0 which has various reliability
> fixes, essentially around making it retry on transient errors.

We should maybe also simply bump the timeout for the cirrus jobs ... 
sometimes they get delayed and just need a little bit more than 60 minutes 
to finish ... so would it be OK to us 70 or 80 minutes here?

  Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09  9:39 Cirrus-CI all red Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-11-09  9:45 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-09  9:56   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-09 11:27     ` Alex Bennée
2021-11-09 11:32       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-16  9:15         ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-11-16 10:40           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-11-16 11:30         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=938ec78f-1ca1-f3df-26be-790e53d9cc7e@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=emaste@freebsd.org \
    --cc=luoyonggang@gmail.com \
    --cc=lwhsu@freebsd.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).