Re: [Qemu-devel] What happened with NPTL/TLS support?

["Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

On 10/22/07, Thayne Harbaugh <thayne@c2.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 21:34 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 18:12 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > When I try to use codesourcery's toolchain arm-2006q3-27 in my Fedora
> > > > 7 box I always have the following issue:
> > > >
> > > > qemu: Unsupported syscall: 983045
> > >
> > > Yep, I've seen that before.
> > >
> > > > I guess it's a problem of NPTL incompatibility. Anyway, the patch that
> > > > Paul Brook sent a while ago solves it [1].
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if it can be integrated or what would be the right way to
> > > > solve this issue. Am I the only one having it?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2005-08/msg00128.html
> > >
> > >
> > > I've been using this patch, as well as other NPTL/TLS patches as well as
> > > some of my own work and have a set of patches for NPTL/TLS that works
> > > reasonably well for arm and i386.  The patches don't apply cleanly to
> > > CVS current, but I'm more than happy to rework them so that they will if
> > > someone is serious about getting NPTL/TLS/futex stuff working for
> > > linux-user.  I haven't submitted my patches because I kept expecting the
> > > other patches to be accepted.
> >
> > Please submit this patch (and resend what you think was missed).
>
> I'll get them reworked and re-sent soon.
>
> Thanks for the interest.

Do you have anything that can be tried out already?

Best regards.

-- 
Felipe Contreras