* [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
@ 2009-07-05 15:25 Avi Kivity
2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-05 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
0.10.6.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-05 15:25 [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6? Avi Kivity
@ 2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-06 0:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: François Revol @ 2009-07-05 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: qemu-devel
> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
> 0.10.6.
I'm still waiting for my wacom merge+fix to get any attention...
François.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-05 15:25 [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6? Avi Kivity
2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
@ 2009-07-06 0:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Contreras @ 2009-07-06 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
> 0.10.6.
How about? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=c2764719914ff0c4d6c06adafea17629600f21ba
--
Felipe Contreras
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
@ 2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2009-07-06 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: François Revol; +Cc: Avi Kivity, qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 406 bytes --]
On 07/05/2009 12:21 PM, François Revol wrote:
>> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
>> 0.10.6.
>>
>
> I'm still waiting for my wacom merge+fix to get any attention...
>
I've already given you feedback (multiple times now) on why I haven't
merged it. If you address my comments, I'll be happy to merge it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> François.
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 911 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-05 15:25 [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6? Avi Kivity
2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
2009-07-06 0:48 ` Felipe Contreras
@ 2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-06 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2009-07-06 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: qemu-devel
On 07/05/2009 10:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
> 0.10.6.
Yup, it is. Expect one Tuesday or Wednesday.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
@ 2009-07-06 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-06 12:43 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-07-06 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Avi Kivity, qemu-devel
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/05/2009 10:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
>> 0.10.6.
>
> Yup, it is. Expect one Tuesday or Wednesday.
It might be nice for save/load patches to be merged before that, so that
migration finally works with virtio. Coding style comments have been
addressed in the latest revision (v5).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-06 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2009-07-06 12:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-06 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-06 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: qemu-devel
On 07/06/2009 03:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 07/05/2009 10:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
>>> 0.10.6.
>>>
>> Yup, it is. Expect one Tuesday or Wednesday.
>>
>
> It might be nice for save/load patches to be merged before that, so that
> migration finally works with virtio. Coding style comments have been
> addressed in the latest revision (v5).
>
Is stable-0.10 actually broken wrt virtio?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-06 12:43 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2009-07-06 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-06 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-07-06 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:43:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/06/2009 03:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/05/2009 10:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are 21 patches in stable-0.10. I think it's high time for qemu
>>>> 0.10.6.
>>>>
>>> Yup, it is. Expect one Tuesday or Wednesday.
>>>
>>
>> It might be nice for save/load patches to be merged before that, so that
>> migration finally works with virtio. Coding style comments have been
>> addressed in the latest revision (v5).
>>
>
> Is stable-0.10 actually broken wrt virtio?
No, it was broken by 53c25cea7d59525ca9aa3fb01cc6947bafbbfb61 in master.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6?
2009-07-06 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2009-07-06 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-07-06 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: qemu-devel
On 07/06/2009 03:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Is stable-0.10 actually broken wrt virtio?
>>
>
> No, it was broken by 53c25cea7d59525ca9aa3fb01cc6947bafbbfb61 in master.
>
stable-0.10 is a separate branch which does not contain
53c25cea7d59525ca9aa3fb01cc6947bafbbfb61.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-06 13:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-05 15:25 [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.10.6? Avi Kivity
2009-07-05 17:21 ` François Revol
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-06 0:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-06 1:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-06 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-06 12:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-06 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-06 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).