From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtiofsd: Fix side-effect in assert()
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:24:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94bab651-8514-3f16-b61e-0f33a8e2d248@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daa895d8-7fbc-e4f5-3cfe-29cae4cd193a@weilnetz.de>
Hi Stefan,
On 4/9/21 5:11 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 09.04.21 um 12:06 schrieb Greg Kurz:
>
>> It is bad practice to put an expression with a side-effect in
>> assert() because the side-effect won't happen if the code is
>> compiled with -DNDEBUG.
>>
>> Use an intermediate variable. Consolidate this in an macro to
>> have proper line numbers when the assertion is hit.
>>
>> virtiofsd: ../../tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c:2797: lo_getxattr:
>> Assertion `fchdir_res == 0' failed.
>> Aborted
>>
>> 2796 /* fchdir should not fail here */
>> =>2797 FCHDIR_NOFAIL(lo->proc_self_fd);
>> 2798 ret = getxattr(procname, name, value, size);
>> 2799 FCHDIR_NOFAIL(lo->root.fd);
>>
>> Fixes: bdfd66788349 ("virtiofsd: Fix xattr operations")
>> Cc: misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
>> ---
>> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
>> b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
>> index 1553d2ef454f..6592f96f685e 100644
>> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
>> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
>> @@ -2723,6 +2723,11 @@ static int xattr_map_server(const struct lo_data
> *lo, const char *server_name,
>> return -ENODATA;
>> }
>> +#define FCHDIR_NOFAIL(fd) do { \
>> + int fchdir_res = fchdir(fd); \
>> + assert(fchdir_res == 0); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char
>> *in_name,
>>
>
>
> I am afraid that this will raise a compiler warning (or error with
> -Werror) when NDEBUG is defined because the variable is unused in that
> case ([-Wunused-variable]).
>
> I suggest to use different implementations of the macro depending on
> NDEBUG.
QEMU doesn't build with NDEBUG, see commit 262a69f4282
("osdep.h: Prohibit disabling assert() in supported builds").
Regards,
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 10:06 [PATCH] virtiofsd: Fix side-effect in assert() Greg Kurz
2021-04-09 10:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09 13:30 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-09 14:40 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2021-04-09 14:56 ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-09 15:11 ` Stefan Weil
2021-04-09 15:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-05-06 15:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94bab651-8514-3f16-b61e-0f33a8e2d248@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).