From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:47:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94c6cead-7ed1-2269-2c2b-8534849d9e41@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190221221052-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 2019/2/22 下午12:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:10:08PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:04:05AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2019/2/22 上午9:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:40:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2019/2/21 下午4:18, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> For 1.0 device, we can fix the queue_enable, but for 0.9x device how do
>>>>> you enable one specific queue in this case? (setting status?)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I understand correctly that for 0.9 device in some cases the device will
>>>>> receive feature _MQ set, but will not receive VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET?
>>>>> Or the problem is different?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me clarify, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET is used to control the the
>>>>> number of queue pairs used by device for doing transmission and reception. It
>>>>> was not used to enable or disable a virtqueue.
>>>>>
>>>>> For 1.0 device, we should use queue_enable in pci cfg to enable and disable
>>>>> queue:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We could do:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq0
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq1
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) Set vq paris to 1
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq2
>>>>>
>>>>> 5) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq3
>>>>>
>>>>> 6) set vq pairs to 2
>>>> I do not think spec allows this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device:
>>>> 1. Reset the device.
>>>> 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device.
>>>> 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the device.
>>>> 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits understood by the OS and driver to the
>>>> device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration
>>>> fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it.
>>>> 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new feature bits after this step.
>>>> 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: otherwise, the device does not
>>>> support our subset of features and the device is unusable.
>>>> 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues for the device, optional per-bus setup,
>>>> reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration space, and population of virtqueues.
>>>> 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thus vqs are setup at step 7.
>>>>
>>>> # of vq pairs are set up through a command which is a special
>>>> buffer, and spec says:
>>>>
>>>> The driver MUST NOT send any buffer available notifications to the device before setting DRIVER_OK.
>>>
>>> So you meant write to queue_enable is forbidden after DRIVER_OK (though it's
>>> not very clear to me from the spec). And if a driver want to enable new
>>> queues, it must reset the device?
>>
>> That's my reading. What do you think?
Looks like I can infer this from the spec, maybe it's better to clarify.
> Btw some legacy drivers might violate this by addig buffers
> before driver_ok.
Yes, but it's probably too late to fix them.
Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>> But this requires a proper implementation for queue_enable for vhost which is
>>>>> missed in qemu and probably what you really want to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> but for 0.9x device, there's no such way to do this. That's the issue.
>>>> 0.9x there's no queue enable, assumption is PA!=0 means VQ has
>>>> been enabled.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So
>>>>> driver must allocate all queBes before starting the device, otherwise there's
>>>>> no way to enable it afterwards.
>>>> As per spec queues must be allocated before DRIVER_OK.
>>>>
>>>> That is universal.
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly, this is not what is done by current windows
>>> drivers.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>>> There're tricks to make it work like what is
>>>>> done in your patch, but it depends on a specific implementation like qemu which
>>>>> is sub-optimal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A fundamental question is what prevents you from just initialization all
>>>>> queues during driver start? It looks to me this save lots of efforts
>>>>> than allocating queue dynamically.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not so trivial in Windows driver, as it does not have objects for queues
>>>>> that it does not use. Linux driver first of all allocates all the
>>>>> queues and then
>>>>> adds Rx/Tx to those it will use. Windows driver first decides how many queues
>>>>> it will use then allocates objects for them and initializes them from zero to
>>>>> fully functional state.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you just need to allocate some memory for the virtqueue, there's no need
>>>>> to make it visible to the rest until it was enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-25 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 3:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-18 9:58 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 16:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 20:49 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 23:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 6:27 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-19 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-20 10:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 6:00 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 6:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 8:18 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 1:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 3:04 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 3:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 4:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-25 7:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-02-25 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 14:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94c6cead-7ed1-2269-2c2b-8534849d9e41@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yan@daynix.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).