From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] aio-posix: call ->poll_end() when removing AioHandler
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 14:35:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94db88e7-1f02-44dd-bc2c-3d9ccf1cce72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <016ac3d1-f6c1-48eb-a714-fb777dff7012@proxmox.com>
On 1/3/24 12:40, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> I'm happy to report that I cannot reproduce the CPU-usage-spike issue
> with the patch, but I did run into an assertion failure when trying to
> verify that it fixes my original stuck-guest-IO issue. See below for the
> backtrace [0]. Hanna wrote in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-3934
>
>> I think it’s sufficient to simply call virtio_queue_notify_vq(vq)
>> after the virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier(vq, ctx) call, because
>> both virtio-scsi’s and virtio-blk’s .handle_output() implementations
>> acquire the device’s context, so this should be directly callable from
>> any context.
>
> I guess this is not true anymore now that the AioContext locking was
> removed?
Good point and, in fact, even before it was much safer to use
virtio_queue_notify() instead. Not only does it use the event notifier
handler, but it also calls it in the right thread/AioContext just by
doing event_notifier_set().
The call to virtio_queue_set_notification(..., 1) is safe; not sure
about the call to virtio_queue_set_notification(..., 0) though. I'd
rather have that executed synchronously in the AioContext using
aio_wait_bh_oneshot(). This is consistent with the pattern used by
virtio_scsi_dataplane_stop() and virtio_blk_data_plane_stop().
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 21:15 [RFC 0/3] aio-posix: call ->poll_end() when removing AioHandler Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 21:15 ` [RFC 1/3] aio-posix: run aio_set_fd_handler() in target AioContext Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 21:15 ` [RFC 2/3] aio: use counter instead of ctx->list_lock Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 21:15 ` [RFC 3/3] aio-posix: call ->poll_end() when removing AioHandler Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 21:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-12-14 20:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-14 20:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-12-18 14:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 21:52 ` [RFC 0/3] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-13 23:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-12-14 19:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-14 13:38 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-12-14 19:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-18 12:41 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-12-18 14:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-12-18 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-12-19 8:40 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-01-02 15:24 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-02 15:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-01-02 16:55 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-03 11:40 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-01-03 13:35 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-01-05 13:43 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-01-05 14:30 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-01-22 17:41 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-22 17:52 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-23 11:12 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-01-23 11:25 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-23 11:15 ` Hanna Czenczek
2024-01-23 16:28 ` Hanna Czenczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94db88e7-1f02-44dd-bc2c-3d9ccf1cce72@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).