From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
Elmar Gerdes <elmar.gerdes@ionos.com>
Subject: Re: an issue for device hot-unplug
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 18:32:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94e21f89-0a3e-701b-7171-7398dff9ce46@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHEcVy5SV34jaubY5F-q=H+smvMVOzKbb=rTaNJDNXyGdFaLZg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Yu,
please open a bug in the bug tracker:
https://gitlab.com/qemu/qemu/-/issues
It's easier to track the problem.
What is the version of QEMU you are using?
Could you provide QEMU command line?
Thanks,
Laurent
On 4/3/23 15:24, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Dear Laurent,
>
> recently we run into an issue with the following error:
>
> command '{ "execute": "device_del", "arguments": { "id": "virtio-diskX" } }' for VM "id"
> failed ({ "return": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Device virtio-diskX is already in
> the process of unplug"} }).
>
> The issue is reproducible. With a few seconds delay before hot-unplug, hot-unplug just
> works fine.
>
> After a few digging, we found that the commit 9323f892b39 may incur the issue.
> ------------------
> failover: fix unplug pending detection
>
> Failover needs to detect the end of the PCI unplug to start migration
> after the VFIO card has been unplugged.
>
> To do that, a flag is set in pcie_cap_slot_unplug_request_cb() and reset in
> pcie_unplug_device().
>
> But since
> 17858a169508 ("hw/acpi/ich9: Set ACPI PCI hot-plug as default on Q35")
> we have switched to ACPI unplug and these functions are not called anymore
> and the flag not set. So failover migration is not able to detect if card
> is really unplugged and acts as it's done as soon as it's started. So it
> doesn't wait the end of the unplug to start the migration. We don't see any
> problem when we test that because ACPI unplug is faster than PCIe native
> hotplug and when the migration really starts the unplug operation is
> already done.
>
> See c000a9bd06ea ("pci: mark device having guest unplug request pending")
> a99c4da9fc2a ("pci: mark devices partially unplugged")
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com <mailto:lvivier@redhat.com>>
> Reviewed-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca <mailto:ani@anisinha.ca>>
> Message-Id: <20211118133225.324937-4-lvivier@redhat.com
> <mailto:20211118133225.324937-4-lvivier@redhat.com>>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com <mailto:mst@redhat.com>>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com <mailto:mst@redhat.com>>
> ------------------
> The purpose is for detecting the end of the PCI device hot-unplug. However, we feel the
> error confusing. How is it possible that a disk "is already in the process of unplug"
> during the first hot-unplug attempt? So far as I know, the issue was also encountered by
> libvirt, but they simply ignored it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878659
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878659>
>
> Hence, a question is: should we have the line below in acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_request_cb()?
>
> pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = true;
>
> It would be great if you as the author could give us a few hints.
>
> Thank you very much for your reply!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Yu Zhang @ Compute Platform IONOS
> 03.04.2013
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-03 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 13:24 an issue for device hot-unplug Yu Zhang
2023-04-03 16:32 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2023-04-03 16:59 ` Yu Zhang
2023-04-04 6:45 ` Jinpu Wang
2023-04-04 12:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 16:00 ` Yu Zhang
2023-04-05 7:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 10:00 ` Jinpu Wang
2023-04-04 12:17 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94e21f89-0a3e-701b-7171-7398dff9ce46@redhat.com \
--to=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=elmar.gerdes@ionos.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yu.zhang@ionos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).