From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
bian naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:47:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <958bdddd-003c-c785-e7e6-f700f1d87bc0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488259090-30034-3-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote:
> Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
> colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
> just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
> we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
> better performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
> * return: 0 means packet same
> * > 0 || < 0 means packet different
> */
> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
> {
> trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>
> if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
> - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
> + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
> + spkt->size - offset);
> } else {
> trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
> return -1;
> @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
>
> - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
> - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
> - }
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
> stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
>
> @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
> }
>
> - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
> - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
> + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
> + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
> + } else {
> + res = -1;
> + }
>
> if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> {
> int ret;
> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
network_header_length looks better.
>
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
>
> - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> + */
I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and
options. We'd better explain this in the comment too.
> + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN);
>
> if (ret) {
> trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
> @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> */
> static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> {
> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
> +
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
>
> - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> + */
> + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
> trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
> ppkt->size);
> qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
> - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
> }
>
> static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=958bdddd-003c-c785-e7e6-f700f1d87bc0@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).