qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	bian naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:47:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <958bdddd-003c-c785-e7e6-f700f1d87bc0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488259090-30034-3-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote:
> Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
> colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
> just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
> we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
> better performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
>    * return:    0  means packet same
>    *            > 0 || < 0 means packet different
>    */
> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
>   {
>       trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
>                                  inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
>                                  inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>   
>       if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
> -        return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
> +        return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
> +                      spkt->size - offset);
>       } else {
>           trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
>           return -1;
> @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>   
>       trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
>   
> -    if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
> -        if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> -            trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
> -        }
> -        return -1;
> -    }
> -
>       ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
>       stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
>   
> @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>           spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
>       }
>   
> -    res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
> -                (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
> +    if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
> +        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
> +    } else {
> +        res = -1;
> +    }
>   
>       if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>           trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>   static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>   {
>       int ret;
> +    int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;

network_header_length looks better.

>   
>       trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
>   
> -    ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> +    /*
> +     * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> +     * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> +     * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> +     * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> +     * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> +     */

I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and 
options. We'd better explain this in the comment too.

> +    ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN);
>   
>       if (ret) {
>           trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
> @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>    */
>   static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>   {
> +    int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
> +
>       trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
>   
> -    if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
> +    /*
> +     * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> +     * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> +     * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> +     * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> +     * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> +     */
> +    if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
>           trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
>                                              ppkt->size);
>           qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>                                  inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
>                                  inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
>                                  inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
> -    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> +    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
>   }
>   
>   static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-28  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-28  5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-02-28  5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
2017-02-28  5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
2017-02-28  5:47   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-02-28  6:11     ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02  7:51       ` Jason Wang
2017-03-02  8:15         ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02  9:35           ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28  5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=958bdddd-003c-c785-e7e6-f700f1d87bc0@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).