* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug @ 2017-02-28 5:18 Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu devel, Jason Wang Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian This series we will Optimize the code and fix some bug. Patch1: Rename colo_packet_compare() and remove duplicate check in compare icmp. Patch2: Optimize compare_common and increase compare performance. Patch3: Fix debug info always print bug. Zhang Chen (3): COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug net/colo-compare.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes 2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu devel, Jason Wang Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian Rename colo_packet_compare() to colo_packet_compare_common() that make tcp_compare udp_compare icmp_compare reuse this function. Remove minimum packet size check in icmp_compare, because we have check this in parse_packet_early(). Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- net/colo-compare.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index 300f017..602a758 100644 --- a/net/colo-compare.c +++ b/net/colo-compare.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode) * return: 0 means packet same * > 0 || < 0 means packet different */ -static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) { trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) { return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size); } else { + trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same"); return -1; } } @@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) int res; trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp"); + if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) { if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same"); @@ -263,7 +265,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) int ret; trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp"); - ret = colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt); + + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); if (ret) { trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); @@ -281,16 +284,9 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) */ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) { - int network_length; - trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp"); - network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size || - ppkt->size < network_length + ETH_HLEN) { - return -1; - } - if (colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt)) { + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) { trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", @@ -316,7 +312,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); - return colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt); + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); } static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu devel, Jason Wang Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp() just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet, we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get better performance. Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644 --- a/net/colo-compare.c +++ b/net/colo-compare.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode) * return: 0 means packet same * > 0 || < 0 means packet different */ -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset) { trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) { - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size); + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset, + spkt->size - offset); } else { trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same"); return -1; @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp"); - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) { - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same"); - } - return -1; - } - ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header; stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header; @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum; } - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN, - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN)); + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) { + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN); + } else { + res = -1; + } if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) { int ret; + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp"); - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * So we just compare the ip payload here. + */ + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN); if (ret) { trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) */ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) { + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; + trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp"); - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) { + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * So we just compare the ip payload here. + */ + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) { trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0); } static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang 2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jason Wang @ 2017-02-28 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel Cc: zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote: > Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize > colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp() > just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet, > we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get > better performance. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c > index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644 > --- a/net/colo-compare.c > +++ b/net/colo-compare.c > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode) > * return: 0 means packet same > * > 0 || < 0 means packet different > */ > -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) > +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset) > { > trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), > inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, > @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) > inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); > > if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) { > - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size); > + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset, > + spkt->size - offset); > } else { > trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same"); > return -1; > @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > > trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp"); > > - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) { > - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { > - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same"); > - } > - return -1; > - } > - > ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header; > stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header; > > @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum; > } > > - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN, > - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN)); > + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) { > + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN); > + } else { > + res = -1; > + } > > if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { > trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), > @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > { > int ret; > + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; network_header_length looks better. > > trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp"); > > - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); > + /* > + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, > + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are > + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random > + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. > + * So we just compare the ip payload here. > + */ I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and options. We'd better explain this in the comment too. > + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN); > > if (ret) { > trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); > @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > */ > static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > { > + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; > + > trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp"); > > - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) { > + /* > + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, > + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are > + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random > + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. > + * So we just compare the ip payload here. > + */ > + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) { > trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", > ppkt->size); > qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", > @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) > inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, > inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src), > inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); > - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); > + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0); > } > > static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang @ 2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen 2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Wang, qemu devel Cc: zhangchen.fnst, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian On 02/28/2017 01:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote: >> Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize >> colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp() >> just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet, >> we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get >> better performance. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c >> index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644 >> --- a/net/colo-compare.c >> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c >> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode) >> * return: 0 means packet same >> * > 0 || < 0 means packet different >> */ >> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) >> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, >> int offset) >> { >> trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, >> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), >> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, >> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet >> *ppkt, Packet *spkt) >> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); >> if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) { >> - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size); >> + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset, >> + spkt->size - offset); >> } else { >> trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same"); >> return -1; >> @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, >> Packet *ppkt) >> trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp"); >> - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) { >> - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { >> - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same"); >> - } >> - return -1; >> - } >> - >> ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header; >> stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header; >> @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet >> *spkt, Packet *ppkt) >> spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum; >> } >> - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN, >> - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN)); >> + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) { >> + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN); >> + } else { >> + res = -1; >> + } >> if (res != 0 && >> trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { >> trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), >> @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet >> *spkt, Packet *ppkt) >> static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) >> { >> int ret; >> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; > > network_header_length looks better. OK, I will rename it. > >> trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp"); >> - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); >> + /* >> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, >> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are >> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a >> random >> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. >> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. >> + */ > > I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and > options. We'd better explain this in the comment too. OK, How about this? + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. + */ Thanks Zhang Chen > >> + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + >> ETH_HLEN); >> if (ret) { >> trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", >> ppkt->size); >> @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, >> Packet *ppkt) >> */ >> static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) >> { >> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; >> + >> trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp"); >> - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) { >> + /* >> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, >> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are >> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a >> random >> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. >> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. >> + */ >> + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + >> ETH_HLEN)) { >> trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", >> ppkt->size); >> qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", >> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet >> *spkt, Packet *ppkt) >> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, >> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src), >> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); >> - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); >> + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0); >> } >> static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t >> *check_time) > > > > . > -- Thanks Zhang Chen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen @ 2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang 2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jason Wang @ 2017-03-02 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel Cc: Li Zhijian, bian naimeng, eddie . dong, zhanghailiang On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote: >> > > OK, How about this? > > + /* > + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, > + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are > + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a > random > + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. > + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header > + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. > + */ > > Thanks > Zhang Chen But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields. Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang @ 2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen 2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-03-02 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Wang, qemu devel Cc: zhangchen.fnst, Li Zhijian, bian naimeng, eddie . dong, zhanghailiang On 03/02/2017 03:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote: >>> >> >> OK, How about this? >> >> + /* >> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, >> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are >> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a >> random >> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. >> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header >> + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. >> + */ >> >> Thanks >> Zhang Chen > > But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields. + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest + * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header include + * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare + * the ip payload here. + */ How about this fixed comments? Thanks Zhang Chen > > Thanks > > > -- Thanks Zhang Chen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp 2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen @ 2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jason Wang @ 2017-03-02 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel Cc: eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian, zhanghailiang On 2017年03月02日 16:15, Zhang Chen wrote: > > > On 03/02/2017 03:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> >> On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote: >>>> >>> >>> OK, How about this? >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, >>> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are >>> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a >>> random >>> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. >>> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP >>> header >>> + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. >>> + */ >>> >>> Thanks >>> Zhang Chen >> >> But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields. > > + /* > + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, > + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are > + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a > random > + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. > + * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary > guest > + * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP > header include > + * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare > + * the ip payload here. > + */ > > How about this fixed comments? > > Thanks > Zhang Chen > > Looks ok. Thanks >> >> Thanks >> >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug 2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu devel, Jason Wang Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- net/colo-compare.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index 61fcdf2..6b38723 100644 --- a/net/colo-compare.c +++ b/net/colo-compare.c @@ -275,9 +275,13 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) if (ret) { trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); - qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", ppkt->size); trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size", spkt->size); - qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", spkt->size); + if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { + qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare pri pkt", + ppkt->size); + qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare sec pkt", + spkt->size); + } } return ret; @@ -303,12 +307,14 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) { trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); - qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", - ppkt->size); trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size", spkt->size); - qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", - spkt->size); + if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { + qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare pri pkt", + ppkt->size); + qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare sec pkt", + spkt->size); + } return -1; } else { return 0; -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-02 9:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen 2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang 2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen 2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang 2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen 2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang 2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).