qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 11:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95ec49bd-1ca5-5896-3481-f631c96f125e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191129094809.26684-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 29.11.19 10:47, Janosch Frank wrote:
> When a guest has saved a ipib of type 5 and call diagnose308 with
> subcode 10, we have to setup the protected processing environment via
> Ultravisor calls. The calls are done by KVM and are exposed via an API.
> 
> The following steps are necessary:
> 1. Create a VM (register it with the Ultravisor)
> 2. Create secure CPUs for all of our current cpus

I do wonder why KVM can't handle that when switching to the encrypted
VM. Any specific reason QEMU has to be involved?

I would have guessed s390_pv_vm_create() can handle that internally. KVM
knows all the VCPUs.

[...]
>      switch (reset_type) {
>      case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
>      case S390_RESET_REIPL:
> @@ -357,6 +361,28 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_initial_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>          break;
> +    case S390_RESET_PV: /* Subcode 10 */
> +        subsystem_reset();
> +        s390_crypto_reset();
> +
> +        CPU_FOREACH(t) {
> +            run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Create SE VM */
> +        s390_pv_vm_create();
> +        CPU_FOREACH(t) {
> +            s390_pv_vcpu_create(t);
> +        }

So, on any other reboot, the VM/CPUs won't get cleaned up?

(is this really a "create" or rather a "s390_pv_vm_enable()").

The "create" terminology somehow sounds wrong to me ...

> +
> +        /* Set SE header and unpack */
> +        s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header();
> +        /* Decrypt image */
> +        s390_ipl_pv_unpack();
> +        /* Verify integrity */
> +        s390_pv_verify();
> +        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
> +        break;
>      default:
>          g_assert_not_reached();
>      }
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> index 31dff0d84e..60db28351d 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(DEFLATE_BASE, "deflate-base", STFL, 151, "Deflate-conversion facility (
>  DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL_ENH, "vxpdeh", STFL, 152, "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(MSA_EXT_9, "msa9-base", STFL, 155, "Message-security-assist-extension-9 facility (excluding subfunctions)")
>  DEF_FEAT(ETOKEN, "etoken", STFL, 156, "Etoken facility")
> +DEF_FEAT(UNPACK, "unpack", STFL, 161, "Unpack facility")
>  
>  /* Features exposed via SCLP SCCB Byte 80 - 98  (bit numbers relative to byte-80) */
>  DEF_FEAT(SIE_GSLS, "gsls", SCLP_CONF_CHAR, 40, "SIE: Guest-storage-limit-suppression facility")
> 


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:18     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:41       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 12:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 14:08     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-02  9:20       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:19   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-12-04 10:48   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:32     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-04 11:34       ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:46         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] s390x: protvirt: Add pv state to cpu env Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:22     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:50     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-05 17:15   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-05 17:34     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-05 17:46       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  7:44         ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  8:29           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  8:45             ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:08               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  9:30                 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:15     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:24       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 11:58   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 12:44     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 12:16   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-05 17:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:04   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 11:08     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95ec49bd-1ca5-5896-3481-f631c96f125e@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).