From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, david@redhat.com,
wangyanan55@huawei.com, philmd@linaro.org,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eduardo@habkost.net,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] target/s390x: filter deprecated properties based on model expansion type
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:46:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9636c2af-7708-4aa3-99ab-ffaff4680b01@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58178bd0-4e7d-4770-aa54-5bd2811dcb39@redhat.com>
On 7/23/24 5:23 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 22/07/2024 16.50, Collin Walling wrote:
>> On 7/20/24 1:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Currently, there is no way to execute the query-cpu-model-expansion
>>>> command to retrieve a comprehenisve list of deprecated properties, as
>>>> the result is dependent per-model. To enable this, the expansion output
>>>> is modified as such:
>>>>
>>>> When reporting a "full" CPU model, show the *entire* list of deprecated
>>>> properties regardless if they are supported on the model. A full
>>>> expansion outputs all known CPU model properties anyway, so it makes
>>>> sense to report all deprecated properties here too.
>>>>
>>>> This allows management apps to query a single model (e.g. host) to
>>>> acquire the full list of deprecated properties.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, when reporting a "static" CPU model, the command will
>>>> only show deprecated properties that are a subset of the model's
>>>> *enabled* properties. This is more accurate than how the query was
>>>> handled before, which blindly reported deprecated properties that
>>>> were never otherwise introduced for certain models.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>> Suggested-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>>
>>>> v3
>>>> - Removed the 'note' and cleaned up documentation
>>>> - Revised commit message
>>>>
>>>> v2
>>>> - Changed commit message
>>>> - Added documentation reflecting this change
>>>> - Made code changes that more accurately filter the deprecated
>>>> properties based on expansion type. This change makes it
>>>> so that the deprecated-properties reported for a static model
>>>> expansion are a subset of the model's properties instead of
>>>> the model's full-definition properties.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> qapi/machine-target.json | 5 +++--
>>>> target/s390x/cpu_models_sysemu.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/qapi/machine-target.json b/qapi/machine-target.json
>>>> index a8d9ec87f5..67086f006f 100644
>>>> --- a/qapi/machine-target.json
>>>> +++ b/qapi/machine-target.json
>>>> @@ -21,8 +21,9 @@
>>>> # @props: a dictionary of QOM properties to be applied
>>>> #
>>>> # @deprecated-props: a list of properties that are flagged as deprecated
>>>> -# by the CPU vendor. These props are a subset of the full model's
>>>> -# definition list of properties. (since 9.1)
>>>> +# by the CPU vendor. These properties are either a subset of the
>>>> +# properties enabled on the CPU model, or a set of properties
>>>> +# deprecated across all models for the architecture.
>>>
>>>
>>> When is it "a subset of the properties enabled on the CPU model", and
>>> when is it "a set of properties deprecated across all models for the
>>> architecture"?
> ...
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback! Pending your response to the above, I'll post
>> a v4.
>
> Since we've got soft-freeze for 9.1 today, I went ahead and put v3 into my
> last pull-request before the freeze period starts already. Please post the
> update to the comments as diff on top of that instead - updates to comments
> should still be fine for merging during the freeze period.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
This is greatly appreciated, Thomas. Thank you!
--
Regards,
Collin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 18:17 [PATCH v3] target/s390x: filter deprecated properties based on model expansion type Collin Walling
2024-07-20 5:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:50 ` Collin Walling
2024-07-23 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2024-07-23 12:46 ` Collin Walling [this message]
2024-07-24 7:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-24 19:42 ` Collin Walling
2024-07-25 6:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-25 7:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-25 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-25 17:22 ` Collin Walling
2024-07-26 7:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-26 19:11 ` Collin Walling
2024-07-26 19:54 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9636c2af-7708-4aa3-99ab-ffaff4680b01@linux.ibm.com \
--to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).